Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19039629›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2008

Use of micafungin versus fluconazole for antifungal prophylaxis in neutropenic patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Yasushi Hiramatsu, Yoshinobu Maeda, Nobuharu Fujii, Takashi Saito, Yuichiro Nawa, Masamichi Hara, Tomofumi Yano, Shoji Asakura, Kazutaka Sunami, Takayuki Tabayashi and 7 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Efficacy and safety of echinocandins versus triazoles for the prophylaxis and treatment of fungal infections: a meta-analysis of RCTs.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A Single-Center, Open-Label Trial of Isavuconazole Prophylaxis against Invasive Fungal Infection in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2020
    Article
  12. Use of micafungin as antifungal prophylaxis in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in Spain (GETH-MIC).Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2020
    Observational
  13. Micafungin as antifungal prophylaxis in non-transplanted haemotological patients.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2020
    Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Antifungal Therapy in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Yasushi HiramatsuDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Respiratory Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan.
Yoshinobu MaedaDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Respiratory Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan.
Nobuharu FujiiDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Respiratory Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan.
Takashi SaitoDepartment of Infection Control and Prevention, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuichiro NawaDivision of Hematology, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.
Masamichi HaraDivision of Hematology, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.
Tomofumi YanoDepartment of Hematology, Okayama Rousai Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Shoji AsakuraDepartment of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
Kazutaka SunamiDepartment of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
Takayuki TabayashiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chugoku Central Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Akira MiyataDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chugoku Central Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Ken-Ichi MatsuokaDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Respiratory Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan.
Katsuji ShinagawaDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Respiratory Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan.
Kazuma IkedaDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Respiratory Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan.
Keitaro MatsuoDivision of Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Aichi, Nagoya, Japan.
Mitsune TanimotoDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Respiratory Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan. tanimoto@md.okayama-u.ac.jp.
West-Japan Hematology and Oncology Group (West-JHOG)
Okayama University · JPChugoku Central Hospital · JPEhime Prefectural Central Hospital · JPNagasaki Rousai Hospital · JPNational Hospital Organization · JPOkayama University of Science · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A prospective randomized clinical trial assessed the efficacy and tolerance of micafungin compared with that of standard fluconazole treatment in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Adult patients (n = 106) were randomly assigned to receive prophylaxis with either micafungin 150 mg (n = 52), or fluconazole 400 mg (n = 52). Success was defined as the absence of suspected, proven, or probable invasive fungal infection (IFI) through the end of therapy and the absence of proven or probable IFI through the end of the 4-week period following treatment. The overall efficacy of micafungin was comparable to that of fluconazole (94 vs. 88%; difference 6.0%; 95% confidence interval, -5.4 to +17.4%; P = 0.295). A total of 2 (4.0%) of 50 patients in the micafungin arm and 6 (12.0%) of 50 patients in the fluconazole arm received empirical antifungal therapy (P = 0.06). Micafungin treatment did not result in increasing adverse effects and had a safe profile as fluconazole in neutropenic patients. This randomized trial indicates that the efficacy and tolerance of micafungin 150 mg was comparable to that of fluconazole 400 mg, suggesting that micafungin at 150 mg daily represents a valuable new treatment option for antifungal prophylaxis in HSCT recipients.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationNeutropeniaAdolescentAdultAgedAntifungal AgentsEchinocandinsFemaleFluconazoleHematologic NeoplasmsHumansLipopeptidesMaleMicafunginMiddle AgedMycosesAntifungal AgentsEchinocandinsFluconazoleLipopeptidesMicafungin

Identifiers

PMID19039629
OpenAlexW2037102380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.