Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19038986›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2009

Identification of structurally conserved residues of proteins in absence of structural homologs using neural network ensemble.

Ganesan Pugalenthi, Ke Tang, P N Suganthan, Saikat Chakrabarti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ganesan PugalenthiSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Ke Tang
P N Suganthan
Saikat Chakrabarti

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationSo far various bioinformatics and machine learning techniques applied for identification of sequence and functionally conserved residues in proteins. Although few computational methods are available for the prediction of structurally conserved residues from protein structure, almost all methods require homologous structural information and structure-based alignments, which still prove to be a bottleneck in protein structure comparison studies. In this work, we developed a neural network approach for identification of structurally important residues from a single protein structure without using homologous structural information and structural alignment.

resultsA neural network ensemble (NNE) method that utilizes negative correlation learning (NCL) approach was developed for identification of structurally conserved residues (SCRs) in proteins using features that represent amino acid conservation and composition, physico-chemical properties and structural properties. The NCL-NNE method was applied to 6042 SCRs that have been extracted from 496 protein domains. This method obtained high prediction sensitivity (92.8%) and quality (Matthew's correlation coefficient is 0.852) in identification of SCRs. Further benchmarking using 60 protein domains containing 1657 SCRs that were not part of the training and testing datasets shows that the NCL-NNE can correctly predict SCRs with approximately 90% sensitivity. These results suggest the usefulness of NCL-NNE for facilitating the identification of SCRs utilizing information derived from a single protein structure. Therefore, this method could be extremely effective in large-scale benchmarking studies where reliable structural homologs and alignments are limited.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerComputational BiologyConserved SequenceDatabases, ProteinProtein ConformationProteinsProtein Structure, TertiaryProteins

Identifiers

PMID19038986
PMCPMC2638999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.