ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2009
Identification of structurally conserved residues of proteins in absence of structural homologs using neural network ensemble.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defining and predicting structurally conserved regions in protein superfamilies.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2013Article
- Identification in silico and experimental validation of novel phosphodiesterase 7 inhibitors with efficacy in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis mice.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationSo far various bioinformatics and machine learning techniques applied for identification of sequence and functionally conserved residues in proteins. Although few computational methods are available for the prediction of structurally conserved residues from protein structure, almost all methods require homologous structural information and structure-based alignments, which still prove to be a bottleneck in protein structure comparison studies. In this work, we developed a neural network approach for identification of structurally important residues from a single protein structure without using homologous structural information and structural alignment.
resultsA neural network ensemble (NNE) method that utilizes negative correlation learning (NCL) approach was developed for identification of structurally conserved residues (SCRs) in proteins using features that represent amino acid conservation and composition, physico-chemical properties and structural properties. The NCL-NNE method was applied to 6042 SCRs that have been extracted from 496 protein domains. This method obtained high prediction sensitivity (92.8%) and quality (Matthew's correlation coefficient is 0.852) in identification of SCRs. Further benchmarking using 60 protein domains containing 1657 SCRs that were not part of the training and testing datasets shows that the NCL-NNE can correctly predict SCRs with approximately 90% sensitivity. These results suggest the usefulness of NCL-NNE for facilitating the identification of SCRs utilizing information derived from a single protein structure. Therefore, this method could be extremely effective in large-scale benchmarking studies where reliable structural homologs and alignments are limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.