Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19038777›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2009

Experience-dependent plasticity mechanisms for neural rehabilitation in somatosensory cortex.

Kevin Fox

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Dynamic reorganization of digit representations in somatosensory cortex of nonhuman primates after spinal cord injury.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Longitudinal in vivo imaging reveals balanced and branch-specific remodeling of mature cortical pyramidal dendritic arbors after stroke.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2010
    Article
  17. Timing is not Everything: Neuromodulation Opens the STDP Gate.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2010
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Introduction. Sensory learning: from neural mechanisms to rehabilitation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kevin FoxSchool of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Museum Avenue, Cardiff CF10 3AX, UK. foxkd@cardiff.ac.uk

Funding

Medical Research Council G0901299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional rehabilitation of the cortex following peripheral or central nervous system damage is likely to be improved by a combination of behavioural training and natural or therapeutically enhanced synaptic plasticity mechanisms. Experience-dependent plasticity studies in the somatosensory cortex have begun to reveal those synaptic plasticity mechanisms that are driven by sensory experience and might therefore be active during behavioural training. In this review the anatomical pathways, synaptic plasticity mechanisms and structural plasticity substrates involved in cortical plasticity are explored, focusing on work in the somatosensory cortex and the barrel cortex in particular.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyBrain InjuriesGene Expression RegulationHumansNeural PathwaysNeuronal PlasticitySomatosensory CortexSynaptic Transmission

Identifiers

PMID19038777
PMCPMC2674476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.