Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19037667›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2009

Effectiveness of a single-day three-drug regimen of dexamethasone, palonosetron, and aprepitant for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting caused by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Steven M Grunberg, Matthew Dugan, Hyman Muss, Marie Wood, Susan Burdette-Radoux, Tracey Weisberg, Marisa Siebel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03606369 (Effectiveness and Quality of Life Analysis of Palonosetron Against Ondansetron Combined With Dexamethasone and Fosaprepitant in Prevention of Acute and Delayed Emesis Associated to Chemotherapy Moderate and Highly Emetogenic in Breast Cancer.), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03606369 phase2 / phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness and Quality of Life Analysis of Palonosetron Against Ondansetron Combined With Dexamethasone and Fosaprepitant in Prevention of Acute and Delayed Emesis Associated to Chemotherapy Moderate and Highly Emetogenic in Breast Cancer.

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Nacional de Cancerologia de MexicoRan2015 to 2020Enrolled560ConditionsBreast Neoplasm, Antineoplastic Agents, Antiemetics, Quality of LifeArmsPalonosetron, Ondansetron
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multi-day vs single-day dexamethasone for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Acute emesis: moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2011
    Guideline
  5. Effect of netupitant, a highly selective NK₁ receptor antagonist, on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam, erythromycin, and dexamethasone.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Prevention of delayed nausea: a University of Rochester Cancer Center Community Clinical Oncology Program study of patients receiving chemotherapy.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2012
    Trial
  8. Aprepitant, dexamethasone, and palonosetron in the prevention of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide-induced nausea and vomiting.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012
    Trial
  9. Differential time course of action of 5-HT3 and NK1 receptor antagonists when used with highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC and MEC).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2011
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Global inequitable distribution of seminal studies of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Opportunities for cannabis in supportive care in cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2019
    Review
  17. Recent advances in antiemetics: new formulations of 5HTCancer management and research · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Steven M GrunbergDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Vermont Cancer Center, 89 Beaumont Avenue-Given Bldg E214, Burlington, VT 05405, USA. Steven.Grunberg@uvm.edu
Matthew Dugan
Hyman Muss
Marie Wood
Susan Burdette-Radoux
Tracey Weisberg
Marisa Siebel
Maine Medical Center · USUniversity of Vermont · USVermont Cancer Support Network · USStony Brook University · US

Funding

TUMOR GROWTH AND METASTASISP30CA022435 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI FOGARTY, JOHN P · 1985 to 2007
$9.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30CA022435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting includes both Acute (0-24 h) and Delayed (24-120 h) components with different physiologic mechanisms. A combination of a serotonin antagonist, a corticosteroid, and an NK-1 antagonist has proven effective against this problem. However, standard antiemetic regimens require administration over 3-4 days after chemotherapy. The present study evaluated a more convenient single-day three-drug antiemetic regimen for patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsChemotherapy-naïve patients with solid tumors receiving cyclophosphamide and/or doxorubicin were eligible. Patients could not have pre-existing etiologies for vomiting. Prior to chemotherapy, patients received a single dose of aprepitant 285 mg p.o., dexamethasone 20 mg p.o., and palonosetron 0.25 mg i.v. A daily patient diary recording episodes of emesis and severity of nausea was then kept for 5 days. Any further antiemetics were considered rescue medication.

resultsForty-one eligible and evaluable patients (40 women, one man) with breast cancer were entered on study. Most were receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Complete Response (no vomiting, no rescue medication) was seen in 51% of patients, including 76% with Complete Response for the Acute period and 66% for the Delayed period. No emesis was reported for 100% of patients in the Acute period and 95% in the Delayed period. No Nausea was seen in 32% of patients. No untoward toxicities were seen.

conclusionA single-day three-drug antiemetic regimen is feasible and effective for protection against both Acute and Delayed vomiting after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Formal comparison to a standard multi-day antiemetic regimen is warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsAprepitantBreast NeoplasmsBreast Neoplasms, MaleChemotherapy, AdjuvantCyclophosphamideDexamethasoneDoxorubicinDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansIsoquinolinesAntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsAprepitantCyclophosphamideDexamethasoneDoxorubicinIsoquinolinesMorpholinesPalonosetronQuinuclidines

Identifiers

PMID19037667
OpenAlexW2133609698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.