ArticleHeart and vessels2008
Routine coronary angiographic follow-up and subsequent revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical impact of routine follow-up coronary angiography after second- or third-generation drug-eluting stent insertion in clinically stable patients.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2015Observational
- Data feedback reduces door-to-balloon time in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.Heart and vessels · 2011Article
- Ubiquitous atherosclerosis in coronary arteries without angiographically significant stenosis.Heart and vessels · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aims of the present study are to: (1) clarify the angiographic follow-up (AFU) rate after discharge; (2) elucidate the characteristics of those undergoing it; and (3) determine the impact of AFU on subsequent revascularization procedures among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Three thousand and twenty-one consecutive patients presenting within 48 h of AMI onset were enrolled from 17 centers in Japan between January 1999 and June 2001. To clarify the frequency of AFU and their characteristics, 2736 patients who survived at discharge were analyzed. Among 1160 patients matched by propensity score, the impact of AFU on subsequent revascularization was analyzed. Of 2736 patients, 1367 (50%) underwent AFU and constituted the lower-risk population. Of the 580 matched patient pairs, 120 (21%) in the clinical follow-up group and 198 (34%) in the AFU group underwent subsequent revascularization (hazard ratio 7.54; 95% confidence interval 5.74-9.91). Of the 198 patients in the AFU group, 157 (79%) underwent revascularization at the discretion of the responsible physician based on angiographic findings. Angiographic follow-up led to more subsequent revascularization. More evidence would be necessary to determine the effectiveness and the methods by which patients are selected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.