Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19036930›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2008

Synthetic recombinant bat SARS-like coronavirus is infectious in cultured cells and in mice.

Michelle M Becker, Rachel L Graham, Eric F Donaldson, Barry Rockx, Amy C Sims, Timothy Sheahan, Raymond J Pickles, Davide Corti, Robert E Johnston, Ralph S Baric and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 163 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
163citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

163 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 277 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Self-Replicating RNA Derived from the Genomes of Positive-Strand RNA Viruses.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article

103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michelle M BeckerDepartments of Pediatrics and Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Rachel L Graham
Eric F Donaldson
Barry Rockx
Amy C Sims
Timothy Sheahan
Raymond J Pickles
Davide Corti
Robert E Johnston
Ralph S Baric
Mark R Denison
Bipar · FRVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment Research ProgramP30CA068485 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MATTHEW J TYSKA · 1995 to 2026
$172.8M
SARS Replicase Proteins in Pathogenesis and ReplicationP01AI059443 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BARIC, RALPH S · 2005 to 2009
$9.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA68485NCI NIH HHS P30 CA068485NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI059443NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI59943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Defining prospective pathways by which zoonoses evolve and emerge as human pathogens is critical for anticipating and controlling both natural and deliberate pandemics. However, predicting tenable pathways of animal-to-human movement has been hindered by challenges in identifying reservoir species, cultivating zoonotic organisms in culture, and isolating full-length genomes for cloning and genetic studies. The ability to design and recover pathogens reconstituted from synthesized cDNAs has the potential to overcome these obstacles by allowing studies of replication and pathogenesis without identification of reservoir species or cultivation of primary isolates. Here, we report the design, synthesis, and recovery of the largest synthetic replicating life form, a 29.7-kb bat severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-like coronavirus (Bat-SCoV), a likely progenitor to the SARS-CoV epidemic. To test a possible route of emergence from the noncultivable Bat-SCoV to human SARS-CoV, we designed a consensus Bat-SCoV genome and replaced the Bat-SCoV Spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) with the SARS-CoV RBD (Bat-SRBD). Bat-SRBD was infectious in cell culture and in mice and was efficiently neutralized by antibodies specific for both bat and human CoV Spike proteins. Rational design, synthesis, and recovery of hypothetical recombinant viruses can be used to investigate mechanisms of transspecies movement of zoonoses and has great potential to aid in rapid public health responses to known or predicted emerging microbial threats.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsCells, CulturedChiropteraChlorocebus aethiopsFemaleHumansMembrane GlycoproteinsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMolecular Sequence DataRecombinant ProteinsRecombination, GeneticRespiratory MucosaSevere Acute Respiratory SyndromeSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusMembrane GlycoproteinsRecombinant ProteinsSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusViral Envelope Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19036930
PMCPMC2588415
OpenAlexW2074618762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.