Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19033364›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2009

Nucleic Acids Research annual Database Issue and the NAR online Molecular Biology Database Collection in 2009.

Michael Y Galperin, Guy R Cochrane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Omics-based molecular target and biomarker identification.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2011
    Article
  8. Data standards for Omics data: the basis of data sharing and reuse.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2011
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. PROFESS: a PROtein function, evolution, structure and sequence database.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2010
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Biomedical informatics and translational medicine.Journal of translational medicine · 2010
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael Y GalperinNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA. nardatabase@gmail.com
Guy R Cochrane

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 LM999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current issue of Nucleic Acids Research includes descriptions of 179 databases, of which 95 are new. These databases (along with several molecular biology databases described in other journals) have been included in the Nucleic Acids Research online Molecular Biology Database Collection, bringing the total number of databases in the collection to 1170. In this introductory comment, we briefly describe some of these new databases and review the principles guiding the selection of databases for inclusion in the Nucleic Acids Research annual Database Issue and the Nucleic Acids Research online Molecular Biology Database Collection. The complete database list and summaries are available online at the Nucleic Acids Research web site (http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/).

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticMolecular BiologyInternet

Identifiers

PMID19033364
PMCPMC2686608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.