Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19032789›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2008

Genetic and systems level analysis of Drosophila sticky/citron kinase and dFmr1 mutants reveals common regulation of genetic networks.

Christopher R Bauer, Andrew M Epstein, Sarah J Sweeney, Daniela C Zarnescu, Giovanni Bosco

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular and genetic analysis of the Drosophila model of fragile X syndrome.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2012
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher R BauerDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA. chrisb@email.arizona.edu
Andrew M Epstein
Sarah J Sweeney
Daniela C Zarnescu
Giovanni Bosco
University of Arizona · US

Funding

Developmental control of replication by Drosophila RBR01GM069462 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BOSCO, GIOVANNI · 2004 to 2012
$2.5M
Howard Hughes Medical Institute 71196-521304NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Drosophila, the genes sticky and dFmr1 have both been shown to regulate cytoskeletal dynamics and chromatin structure. These genes also genetically interact with Argonaute family microRNA regulators. Furthermore, in mammalian systems, both genes have been implicated in neuronal development. Given these genetic and functional similarities, we tested Drosophila sticky and dFmr1 for a genetic interaction and measured whole genome expression in both mutants to assess similarities in gene regulation.

resultsWe found that sticky mutations can dominantly suppress a dFmr1 gain-of-function phenotype in the developing eye, while phenotypes produced by RNAi knock-down of sticky were enhanced by dFmr1 RNAi and a dFmr1 loss-of-function mutation. We also identified a large number of transcripts that were misexpressed in both mutants suggesting that sticky and dFmr1 gene products similarly regulate gene expression. By integrating gene expression data with a protein-protein interaction network, we found that mutations in sticky and dFmr1 resulted in misexpression of common gene networks, and consequently predicted additional specific phenotypes previously not known to be associated with either gene. Further phenotypic analyses validated these predictions.

conclusionThese findings establish a functional link between two previously unrelated genes. Microarray analysis indicates that sticky and dFmr1 are both required for regulation of many developmental genes in a variety of cell types. The diversity of transcripts regulated by these two genes suggests a clear cause of the pleiotropy that sticky and dFmr1 mutants display and provides many novel, testable hypotheses about the functions of these genes. As both of these genes are implicated in the development and function of the mammalian brain, these results have relevance to human health as well as to understanding more general biological processes.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksMutationSystems BiologyAnimalsCell PolarityDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEyeFemaleFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Gene Knockdown TechniquesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMaleOocytesPhenotypeProtein Serine-Threonine Kinasescitron-kinaseDrosophila ProteinsFMR1 protein, DrosophilaFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Intracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID19032789
PMCPMC2610033
OpenAlexW2124137017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.