ArticleThe American journal of gastroenterology2008
Clinical guidelines versus universal molecular testing: are we ready to choose an optimal strategy for Lynch syndrome identification?
Article in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in genetic technologies result in improved diagnosis of mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal and endometrial cancers.Journal of medical genetics · 2022Article
- Mismatch repair defects and Lynch syndrome: The role of the basic scientist in the battle against cancer.DNA repair · 2016Review
- Current Lynch syndrome tumor screening practices: a survey of genetic counselors.Journal of genetic counseling · 2014Article
- Era of universal testing of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2013Article
- Microsatellite instability among individuals of Hispanic origin with colorectal cancer.Cancer · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lynch syndrome, also known as hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), is the most common form of inherited colorectal cancer (CRC). Affected individuals need to undergo intensive CRC surveillance, screening for associated cancers, and possibly prophylactic surgery. Clinically-based guidelines have been used as the basis for Lynch syndrome screening in CRC patient populations. More recently, it has been argued that the universal molecular testing strategies should be implemented to increase the identification of patients who should get germline testing for Lynch syndrome. In this issue of American Journal of Gastroenterology, Julie et al. compare the performance of clinical guidelines with a molecular strategy based on universal microsatellite instability (MSI) testing for identifying CRC patients who have Lynch syndrome. Although there is insufficient evidence to support universal molecular testing for all CRC patients at the current time, the study highlights the need for a systematic approach to identify patients with Lynch syndrome. Physicians and health care systems need to do a better job of identifying patients and families with early-onset of CRC and/or a consistent cancer family history so that they may undergo appropriate molecular evaluation, genetic counseling, and cancer risk management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.