Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19032469›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of gastroenterology2008

Clinical guidelines versus universal molecular testing: are we ready to choose an optimal strategy for Lynch syndrome identification?

Stacey A DaCosta Byfield, Sapna Syngal

Abstract readCommentEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stacey A DaCosta Byfield
Sapna Syngal

Funding

Program in Cancer Research Outcomes Training (PCORT)R25CA092203 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI GAZELLE, G SCOTT · 2002 to 2016
$8.2M
The Genetics and Prevention of Gastrointestinal CancersK24CA113433 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI SYNGAL, SAPNA · 2005 to 2014
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA92203-04NCI NIH HHS K24 CA113433NCI NIH HHS R25 CA092203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lynch syndrome, also known as hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), is the most common form of inherited colorectal cancer (CRC). Affected individuals need to undergo intensive CRC surveillance, screening for associated cancers, and possibly prophylactic surgery. Clinically-based guidelines have been used as the basis for Lynch syndrome screening in CRC patient populations. More recently, it has been argued that the universal molecular testing strategies should be implemented to increase the identification of patients who should get germline testing for Lynch syndrome. In this issue of American Journal of Gastroenterology, Julie et al. compare the performance of clinical guidelines with a molecular strategy based on universal microsatellite instability (MSI) testing for identifying CRC patients who have Lynch syndrome. Although there is insufficient evidence to support universal molecular testing for all CRC patients at the current time, the study highlights the need for a systematic approach to identify patients with Lynch syndrome. Physicians and health care systems need to do a better job of identifying patients and families with early-onset of CRC and/or a consistent cancer family history so that they may undergo appropriate molecular evaluation, genetic counseling, and cancer risk management.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingPractice Guidelines as TopicColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisHumans

Identifiers

PMID19032469
PMCPMC3584336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.