Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19030982›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2009

Unprotected anal intercourse among immigrant Latino MSM: the role of characteristics of the person and the sexual encounter.

Maria Cecilia Zea, Carol A Reisen, Paul J Poppen, Fernanda T Bianchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria Cecilia ZeaDepartment of Psychology, George Washington University, 2125 G. St., NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA. zea@gwu.edu
Carol A Reisen
Paul J Poppen
Fernanda T Bianchi

Funding

Contextual Influences on Sexual Risk among Latino MSMR01HD046258 · NICHD · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ZEA, MARIA CECILIA · 2003 to 2007
$2.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD046258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theoretical models of sexual risk-taking have traditionally focused on personal characteristics, but conceptual approaches emphasizing the social and situational context have also been proposed. This study examined the impact of characteristics of the person and of the sexual encounter on unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) among 482 immigrant Latino MSM. Analyses included logistic regression and hierarchical linear modeling. The personal characteristic of self-efficacy for safer sex was negatively associated with UAI over the previous three months, at the most recent encounter, and over multiple encounters reported by each participant. In addition, a cross-level interaction of self-efficacy at the person-level and sexual desire at the encounter-level showed that increased sexual desire was associated with greater likelihood of UAI for those with low self-efficacy, but not those with high self-efficacy. Likelihood of UAI was also linked to the situational characteristics of closeness to the partner, seroconcordance, and concern about STIs in the encounter.

Indexed as

Unsafe SexEmigrants and ImmigrantsHispanic or LatinoHIV SeropositivityHumansInterpersonal RelationsLogistic ModelsMaleObject AttachmentRisk-TakingSelf EfficacySexual BehaviorSexual PartnersSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID19030982
PMCPMC2718061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.