Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19030020›Full record

ReviewProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2009

5alpha-Reductase inhibitor treatment of prostatic diseases: background and practical implications.

J Dörsam, J Altwein

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The role of adrenal derived androgens in castration resistant prostate cancer.The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer.World journal of oncology · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Novel hormonal approaches in prostate cancer.Current oncology reports · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J DörsamSt. Theresienkrankenhaus, Nürnberg, Germany. joachim-doersam@t-online.de
J Altwein
Diabetesinstitut Heidelberg · DEMünchen Klinik Bogenhausen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This literature review discusses the theoretical background of 5alpha-reductase inhibitor (5ARI) treatment and the resulting clinical implications. A Medline-based search for peer-reviewed articles addressing 5ARIs, benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer was performed. The 5ARIs Finasteride and Dutasteride, which specifically inhibit the production of dihydrotestosterone by acting as competitive inhibitors of 5alpha-reductase, are clinically well tolerated and represent an effective treatment option for benign prostatic obstruction. Finasteride is the first compound which has a proven efficacy in chemoprevention of prostate cancer. The aim of this review was to elucidate, if there are sufficient data available to point out clinically relevant differences between the drugs. Both compounds achieve a significant reduction of prostate volume, an improvement of symptoms and a lower risk of acute urinary retention. Whether the different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of Finasteride and Dutasteride are of clinical importance cannot be judged at this time.

Indexed as

5-alpha Reductase InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsAzasteroidsDutasterideEnzyme InhibitorsFinasterideHumansMaleProstatic HyperplasiaProstatic Neoplasms5-alpha Reductase InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsAzasteroidsDutasterideEnzyme InhibitorsFinasteride

Identifiers

PMID19030020
OpenAlexW1996993732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.