Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19025615›Full record

ArticleTrials2008

VAST: Vertebral Artery Stenting Trial. Protocol for a randomised safety and feasibility trial.

A Compter, H B van der Worp, W J Schonewille, J A Vos, A Algra, T H Lo, W P Th M Mali, F L Moll, L J Kappelle

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03381534 (Safety and Efficacy of Distal Embolic Protection Device in Vertebral Artery Origin Stent Angioplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03381534 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Efficacy of Distal Embolic Protection Device in Vertebral Artery Origin Stent Angioplasty :A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorXuanwu Hospital, BeijingRan2017 to 2020Enrolled256ConditionsAdverse EventArmsstenting with EPD, stent assisted angioplasty
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Treatment of vertebral artery origin stenosis with a Pharos stent device: a single center experience.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2011
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Safety and efficacy of different stent types for the endovascular therapy of extracranial vertebral artery disease.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A CompterDepartment of Neurology, Rudolf Magnus Institute for Neuroscience, University Medical Centre Utrecht, HP G 03,228, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands. a.compter@umcutrecht.nl
H B van der Worp
W J Schonewille
J A Vos
A Algra
T H Lo
W P Th M Mali
F L Moll
L J Kappelle
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTwenty to 30 percent of all transient ischaemic attacks and ischaemic strokes involve tissue supplied by the vertebrobasilar circulation. Atherosclerotic stenosis >/= 50% in the vertebral artery accounts for vertebrobasilar stroke in at least one third of the patients. The risk of recurrent vascular events in patients with vertebral stenosis is uncertain and revascularisation of vertebral stenosis is rarely performed. Observational studies have suggested that the risk of subsequent stroke or death in patients with vertebrobasilar ischaemic events is comparable with that in patients with carotid territory events. Treatment of vertebral stenosis by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty has been introduced as an attractive treatment option. The safety and benefit of stenting of symptomatic vertebral stenosis as compared with best medical therapy alone remains to be elucidated in a randomised clinical trial. STUDY

objectivesThe primary aim of the Vertebral Artery Stenting Trial (VAST) is to assess whether stenting for symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis >/= 50% is feasible and safe. A secondary aim is to assess the rate of new vascular events in the territory of the vertebrobasilar arteries in patients with symptomatic vertebral stenosis >/= 50% on best medical therapy with or without stenting.

designThis is a randomised, open clinical trial, comparing best medical treatment with or without vertebral artery stenting in patients with recently symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis >/= 50%. The trial will include a total of 180 patients with transient ischaemic attack or non-disabling ischaemic stroke attributed to vertebral artery stenosis >/= 50%. The primary outcome is any stroke, vascular death, or non-fatal myocardial infarction within 30 days after start of treatment. Secondary outcome measures include any stroke or vascular death during follow-up and the degree of (re)stenosis after one year. DISCUSSION: Improvements both in imaging of the vertebral artery and in endovascular techniques have created new opportunities for the treatment of symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis. This trial will assess the feasibility and safety of stenting for symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis and will provide sufficient data to inform a conclusive randomised trial testing the benefit of this treatment strategy. The VAST is supported by the Netherlands Heart Foundation (2007B045; ISRCTN29597900).

Identifiers

PMID19025615
PMCPMC2611963
OpenAlexW2087101594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.