ReviewDrugs & aging2008
Current issues in thromboprophylaxis in the elderly.
Review in Drugs & aging, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The elderly are at particularly high risk for arterial and venous thromboembolism, both of which are associated with significant morbidity and mortality in this age group. However, this age group often receives inadequate thromboprophylaxis because of concerns about bleeding risk, which is often over-estimated, denying patients the benefit of proven antithrombotic regimens. Guidelines advocate active and comprehensive thromboprophylactic strategies across all age groups and recent studies have addressed age considerations in both arterial and venous embolic disorders. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis has repeatedly been shown to have a favourable risk-benefit profile, including in elderly populations. The benefits of thromboprophylaxis have long been recognized in surgical patients and recent studies have confirmed the safety and efficacy of thromboprophylaxis in medical patients, with most trials having included elderly cohorts. Given the difficulties and inconvenience associated with use of current anticoagulants, new drugs are under development and whilst some have been associated with significant adverse effects, others have demonstrated low bleeding risks without the need for coagulation monitoring. Meanwhile, other new agents currently on the market, such as fondaparinux sodium, have gained license for use in orthopaedic and general surgery patients, although clinical experience with these agents in elderly populations is limited. This article discusses the latest developments and current opinions regarding thromboprophylaxis, with particular emphasis on its relevance to the elderly population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.