Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19020862›Full record

ReviewKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2009

Clinical application of scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering.

Junji Iwasa, Lars Engebretsen, Yosuke Shima, Mitsuo Ochi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Osteochondral tissue engineering approaches for articular cartilage and subchondral bone regeneration.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2012
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Cell-free collagen type I matrix for repair of cartilage defects-clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2012
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Cartilage Repair: Promise of Adhesive Orthopedic Hydrogels.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Dominant role ofBioactive materials · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Junji IwasaOslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, P.O. Box 4014, Ullevaal Stadion, 0806, Oslo, Norway. junjiiwasa@yahoo.co.jp
Lars Engebretsen
Yosuke Shima
Mitsuo Ochi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to review the basic science and clinical literature on scaffolds clinically available for the treatment of articular cartilage injuries. The use of tissue-engineered grafts based on scaffolds seems to be as effective as conventional ACI clinically. However, there is limited evidence that scaffold techniques result in homogeneous distribution of cells. Similarly, few studies exist on the maintenance of the chondrocyte phenotype in scaffolds. Both of which would be potential advantages over the first generation ACI. The mean clinical score in all of the clinical literature on scaffold techniques significantly improved compared with preoperative values. More than 80% of patients had an excellent or good outcome. None of the short- or mid-term clinical and histological results of these tissue-engineering techniques with scaffolds were reported to be better than conventional ACI. However, some studies suggest that these methods may reduce surgical time, morbidity, and risks of periosteal hypertrophy and post-operative adhesions. Based on the available literature, we were not able to rank the scaffolds available for clinical use. Firm recommendations on which cartilage repair procedure is to be preferred is currently not known on the basis of these studies. Randomized clinical trials and longer follow-up periods are needed for more widespread information regarding the clinical effectiveness of scaffold-based, tissue-engineered cartilage repair.

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsCartilage, ArticularChondrocytesClinical Trials as TopicFractures, CartilageHumansKnee InjuriesTransplantation, AutologousBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID19020862
PMCPMC2688024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.