ArticlePlant physiology2009
Analysis of site frequency spectra from Arabidopsis with context-dependent corrections for ancestral misinference.
Article in Plant physiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Natural variation and improved genome annotation of the emerging biofuel crop field pennycress (Thlaspi arvense).G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Gene flow as a simple cause for an excess of high-frequency-derived alleles.Evolutionary applications · 2020Article
- Genomic variations and distinct evolutionary rate of rare alleles in Arabidopsis thaliana.BMC evolutionary biology · 2016Article
- Recombination is associated with the evolution of genome structure and worker behavior in honey bees.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012Article
- Population genomics and local adaptation in wild isolates of a model microbial eukaryote.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that the pattern of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) deviates from the distribution expected under a neutral model. Here, we test whether or not ancestral misinference could explain this deviation. We start by showing that there are significant and complex influences of context on mutation dynamics as inferred from SNP frequency, in Arabidopsis, and compare the results to observations about context dependency that have been made on a previous analysis of a maize (Zea mays) SNP dataset. The data concerning heterogeneity across sites are then used to make corrections for ancestral misinference in a context-dependent manner. Using Arabidopsis lyrata to infer the ancestral state for SNPs, we show that the resulting unfolded site frequency spectrum (SFS) in Arabidopsis is skewed toward sites with high frequency derived nucleotides. Sites are also partitioned into two general functional classes, second codon position and 4-fold degenerate sites. These two classes show different SFS; although both show an overrepresentation of high frequency derived sites, low frequency derived sites are vastly overrepresented at the second codon position, but significantly underrepresented at 4-fold degenerate sites. We find that these results are robust to corrections for ancestral misinference, even when context-dependent variation in mutation properties is taken into consideration. The data suggest that, in addition to purifying selection, complex demographic events and/or linked positive selection need to be invoked to explain the SFS, and they highlight the importance of sequence context in analyses of genome-wide variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.