ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2009
Genome and proteome annotation: organization, interpretation and integration.
Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applying a Conservation-Based Approach for Predicting Novel Phosphorylation Sites in Eukaryotes and Evaluating Their Functional Relevance.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
- An overview of technologies for MS-based proteomics-centric multi-omics.Expert review of proteomics · 2022Article
- The Human Salivary Proteome Wiki: A Community-Driven Research Platform.Journal of dental research · 2021Article
- Proteogenomic Analysis and Discovery of Immune Antigens inMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2017Article
- An orthology-based analysis of pathogenic protozoa impacting global health: an improved comparative genomics approach with prokaryotes and model eukaryote orthologs.Omics : a journal of integrative biology · 2014Article
- A domain-centric solution to functional genomics via dcGO Predictor.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- metabolicMine: an integrated genomics, genetics and proteomics data warehouse for common metabolic disease research.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2013Article
- Improving N-terminal protein annotation of Plasmodium species based on signal peptide prediction of orthologous proteins.Malaria journal · 2012Article
- Article
- Ecological transcriptomics of lake-type and riverine sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka).BMC ecology · 2011Article
- A proteogenomic analysis of Shigella flexneri using 2D LC-MALDI TOF/TOF.BMC genomics · 2011Article
- Do we need new antibiotics? The search for new targets and new compounds.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2010Article
- A protein sequence meta-functional signature for calcium binding residue prediction.Pattern recognition letters · 2010Article
- MimoSA: a system for minimotif annotation.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
- Identification of NAD interacting residues in proteins.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
- Alternative splicing of transcription factors' genes: beyond the increase of proteome diversity.Comparative and functional genomics · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent years have seen a huge increase in the generation of genomic and proteomic data. This has been due to improvements in current biological methodologies, the development of new experimental techniques and the use of computers as support tools. All these raw data are useless if they cannot be properly analysed, annotated, stored and displayed. Consequently, a vast number of resources have been created to present the data to the wider community. Annotation tools and databases provide the means to disseminate these data and to comprehend their biological importance. This review examines the various aspects of annotation: type, methodology and availability. Moreover, it puts a special interest on novel annotation fields, such as that of phenotypes, and highlights the recent efforts focused on the integrating annotations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.