Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19019444›Full record

Trial reportOphthalmology2009

Visual field progression in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study the impact of treatment and other baseline factors.

David C Musch, Brenda W Gillespie, Paul R Lichter, Leslie M Niziol, Nancy K Janz, CIGTS Study Investigators

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Ophthalmology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 190 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
190citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
15.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

190 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 434 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Medical versus surgical interventions for open angle glaucoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

130 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David C MuschDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, USA.
Brenda W Gillespie
Paul R Lichter
Leslie M Niziol
Nancy K Janz
CIGTS Study Investigators
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

COLLABORATIVE STUDY OF INITIAL GLAUCOMA TREATMENTU10EY009149 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LICHTER, PAUL R · 1993 to 2003
$4.8M
Analysis of CIGTS Visual Field DataR03EY015860 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MUSCH, DAVID C · 2004 to 2005
$459k
COLLABORATIVE INITIAL GLAUCOMA TREATMENT STUDYU10EY009144 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SHERWOOD, MARK B · 1993 to 2003
$453k
Clinical and Quality of Life Insights on Glaucoma from Analyses of CIGTS DataR21EY018690 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MUSCH, DAVID C · 2008 to 2009
$425k
COLLABORATIVE INITIAL GLAUCOMA TREATMENT STUDYU10EY009639 · NEI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CASHWELL, LEON F · 1993 to 2002
$385k
COLLABORATIVE INITIAL GLAUCOMA TREATMENT STUDYU10EY009143 · NEI · WILLS EYE HOSPITAL (PHILADELPHIA) · PI SPAETH, GEORGE L · 1993 to 2002
$353k
COLLABORATIVE INITIAL GLAUCOMA TREATMENT STUDYU10EY009100 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI VARMA, ROHIT · 1993 to 2003
$314k
COLLABORATIVE INITIAL GLAUCOMA TREATMENT STUDYU10EY009141 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CHEN, PHILIP P · 1993 to 2002
$303k
COLLABORATIVE INITIAL GLAUCOMA TREATMENT STUDYU10EY009150 · NEI · CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION · PI ROCKWOOD, EDWARD J · 1993 to 2003
$281k
COLLABORATIVE INITIAL GLAUCOMA TREATMENT STUDYU10EY009148 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JAMPEL, HENRY D · 1993 to 2002
$275k
COLLABORATIVE INITIAL GLAUCOMA TREATMENT STUDYU10EY009140 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI GROSS, RONALD · 1993 to 2003
$249k
COLLABORATIVE INITIAL GLAUCOMA TREATMENT STUDYU10EY009142 · NEI · NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE · PI RITCH, ROBERT H · 1993 to 2003
$232k
NEI NIH HHS EY015860NEI NIH HHS EY09100NEI NIH HHS EY09140NEI NIH HHS EY09141NEI NIH HHS EY09142NEI NIH HHS EY09143NEI NIH HHS EY09144NEI NIH HHS EY09145NEI NIH HHS EY09148NEI NIH HHS EY09149NEI NIH HHS EY09150NEI NIH HHS EY09639NEI NIH HHS R03 EY015860NEI NIH HHS R21 EY018690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate factors associated with visual field (VF) progression, using all available follow-up through 9 years after treatment initiation, in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS).

designLongitudinal follow-up of participants enrolled in a randomized clinical trial.

participantsSix hundred seven newly diagnosed glaucoma patients.

methodsIn a randomized clinical trial, 607 subjects with newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma initially were treated with either medication or trabeculectomy. After treatment initiation and early follow-up, subjects were evaluated clinically at 6-month intervals. Study participants in both arms of the CIGTS were treated aggressively in an effort to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) to a level at or below a predetermined, eye-specific target pressure. Visual field progression was analyzed using repeated measures models.

main outcome measuresVisual field progression, measured by Humphrey 24-2 full-threshold testing and assessed by the change in the mean deviation (MD), and an indicator of substantial worsening of the VF (MD decrease of > or =3 dB from baseline), assessed at each follow-up visit.

resultsFollow-up indicated minimal change from baseline in each initial treatment group's average MD. However, at the 8-year follow-up examination, substantial worsening (> or =3 dB) of MD from baseline was found in 21.3% and 25.5% of the initial surgery and initial medicine groups, respectively. The effect of initial treatment on subsequent VF loss was modified by time (P<0.0001), baseline MD (P = 0.03), and diabetes (P = 0.01). Initial surgery led to less VF progression than initial medicine in subjects with advanced VF loss at baseline, whereas subjects with diabetes had more VF loss over time if treated initially with surgery.

conclusionsThe CIGTS intervention protocol led to a lowering of IOP that persisted over time in both treatment groups. Progression in VF loss was seen in a subset, increasing to more than 20% of the subjects. The findings regarding initial surgery being beneficial for subjects with more advanced VF loss at presentation, but detrimental for patients with diabetes, are noteworthy and warrant independent confirmation. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Indexed as

TrabeculectomyVisual FieldsAdultAgedAgingAntihypertensive AgentsDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsTonometry, OcularAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID19019444
PMCPMC3316491
OpenAlexW1768004330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.