Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19019304›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2008

Current and future standards in treatment of myasthenia gravis.

Ralf Gold, Christiane Schneider-Gold

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Pulmonary edema in myasthenic crisis.Case reports in critical care · 2013
    Article
  18. Myasthenia gravis: a review.Autoimmune diseases · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ralf GoldDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. ralf.gold@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
Christiane Schneider-Gold
Ruhr University Bochum · DESt. Josef-Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a prototypic antibody-mediated neurological autoimmune disorder. Herein we characterize modern treatment algorithms that are adapted to disease severity, and introduce the current principles of escalating strategies for MG treatment. In non-thymoma patients younger than about 50 years of age and with generalized weakness, a complete early (but not urgent) thymectomy is considered as state-of-the-art on the basis of circumstantial evidence and expert opinion. In up to 10% of patients, MG is associated with a thymoma (i.e., is of paraneoplastic origin). The best surgical type of procedure is still under debate. Myasthenic crisis is best treated by plasmapheresis, mostly combined with immunoabsorption techniques. Intravenous immunoglobulins are a reasonable alternative, but a shortage in supplies and high prices limit their use. In generalized MG, a wide array of immunosuppressive treatments has been established, although not formally tested in double-blind, prospective trials. With regard to immunosuppression, azathioprine is still the standard baseline treatment, often combined with initial corticosteroids. In rare patients with an inborn hepatic enzyme deficiency of thiomethylation, azathioprine may be substituted by mycophenolate mofetil. Severe cases may benefit from combined immunosuppression with corticosteroids, cyclosporine A, and even with moderate doses of methotrexate or cyclophosphamide. Tacrolimus is under investigation. In refractory cases, immunoablation via high-dose cyclophosphamide followed by trophic factors such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor has also been suggested. In the future we may face an increased use of novel, B-cell, or T-cell-directed monoclonal antibodies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAutoantibodiesGlucocorticoidsHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMyasthenia GravisPlasmapheresisThymectomyAntibodies, MonoclonalAutoantibodiesGlucocorticoidsImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID19019304
PMCPMC4514693
OpenAlexW1987855219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.