Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19018586›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2008

Analysis of the DDE motif in the Mutator superfamily.

Aurélie Hua-Van, Pierre Capy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Divergent Evolutionary Profile ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Biology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evolution ofMobile DNA · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The catalytic domain of all eukaryotic cut-and-paste transposase superfamilies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Integrating prokaryotes and eukaryotes: DNA transposases in light of structure.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aurélie Hua-VanLaboratoire Evolution, Génomes et Spéciation UPR9034, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France. ahuavan@legs.cnrs-gif.fr
Pierre Capy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The eukaryotic Mutator family of transposable elements is widespread in plants. Active or potentially active copies are also found in fungi and protozoans, and sequences related to this family have been detected in metazoans as well. Members of this family are called Mutator-like elements (MULEs). They encode transposases, which contain a region conserved with transposases of the IS256 prokaryotic family, known to harbor a DDE catalytic domain. Different DDE or D34E motifs have been proposed in some groups of eukaryotic MULEs based on primary sequence conservation. On a large number of protein sequences related to, and representative of, all MULE families, we analyzed global conservation, the close environment of different acidic residues and the secondary structure. This allowed us to identify a potential DDE motif that is likely to be homologous to the one in IS256-like transposases. The characteristics of this motif are depicted in each known family of MULEs. Different hypotheses about the evolution of this triad are discussed.

Indexed as

Amino Acid MotifsConserved SequenceDNA Transposable ElementsMolecular Sequence DataMutationPhylogenyProtein FoldingProtein Structure, SecondarySequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, ProteinTransposasesDNA Transposable ElementsTransposases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.