Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19018569›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2009

Clinical, serological, and molecular evidence of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis in dogs in Tunisia.

Y M'ghirbi, A Ghorbel, M Amouri, A Nebaoui, S Haddad, A Bouattour

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. First Molecular Evidence for the Presence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Epidemiological and Clinicopathological Features ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Associated Factors to Seroprevalence ofJournal of tropical medicine · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Y M'ghirbiService d'Entomologie Médicale, Institut Pasteur de Tunis, 1002 Tunis, Tunisia. youmna_mgh@hotmail.com
A Ghorbel
M Amouri
A Nebaoui
S Haddad
A Bouattour
École Normale Supérieure - PSL · FRInstitut Pasteur de Tunis · TN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A seroepidemiological survey was conducted in five bioclimatic areas of Tunisia to determine the prevalence of antibodies to Ehrlichia canis and Anaplasma phagocytophilum antigens, surrogate markers of the agents of canine monocytic ehrlichiosis (CME) and canine granulocytic ehrlichiosis, respectively. Among 286 collected sera, 54.2% and 25.2% were seropositive for E. canis and A. phagocytophilum, respectively, by the indirect immunofluorescence antibody (IFA) test. Clinical and hematological tests were done only for 58 sick dogs from Tunis area. A reverse line blot (RLB) hybridization was then used to identify isolated Ehrlichia and Anaplasma species infecting dogs (n = 228). Among them, only two dogs were infected by A. phagocytophilum; ten sample dogs were demonstrated infected by E. canis and ten infected by Ehrlichia sp., from which one dog showed a mixed infection with A. phagocytophilum and E. canis and one with A. phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia sp. RLB findings were confirmed by sequencing; BLAST search against GenBank revealed high similarity of the sequence of Ehrlichia sp. PCR/RLB amplicons with Anaplasma platys 16S rRNA partial sequence.

Indexed as

Anaplasma phagocytophilumAnaplasmosisDog DiseasesEhrlichia canisAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialDNA, BacterialDogsEhrlichiosisMolecular Sequence DataPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNATunisiaAntibodies, BacterialDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID19018569
OpenAlexW1991021076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.