ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2009
Current recommendations on infants' sleeping position are being followed-initial results of a population-based sentinel study on risk factors for SIDS, 1996-2006, in Hamburg, Germany.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The association of public health interventions regarding both infant sleep position and pertussis immunization with sudden infant death syndrome rates: an ecological study.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Infant Care Practices, Caregiver Awareness of Safe Sleep Advice and Barriers to Implementation: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI) in the early neonatal period: the role of bed-sharing.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2014Article
- Unintentional injury and its prevention in infant: knowledge and self-reported practices of main caregivers.BMC pediatrics · 2014Article
- Petechial bleedings in sudden infant death.International journal of legal medicine · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is a target for public health care in Germany. The aim of this study was to monitor data on risk-related behavior in the population of Hamburg, Germany, in order to respond to changes quickly and to estimate the effectiveness of prevention activities. Data have been gathered using the sentinel system with repeated surveys (1996, 1998, 2001, and 2006) in pediatric practices, thus allowing an estimate of the prevalence of risk factors in an urban population, both transversally and vertically. From 1996 to 2007, the SIDS rate in Hamburg fell from 0.9/1,000 live births to 0.1. The prevalence of infants sleeping prone declined from 8.1% in 1996 to 3.5% in 2006. In this small subgroup, up to 81.7% (2006) of the caretakers were well aware of the risk of sleeping prone. The prevalence of infants sleeping on their sides fell from 55.3% in 1998 to 10.6% in 2006. The sentinel setting is suitable for gathering risk-related data on SIDS. Despite the fact that, so far, no nationwide back-to-sleep campaign has been instituted in Germany, local campaigns have proved successful in reducing prone sleeping for infants. Moreover, the substantial reduction of side sleeping within a short time span going along with a reduced SIDS rate is an indicator of the effectiveness of prevention activities on a local basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.