Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2008
Health-related quality of life and distress in cancer patients: results from a large randomised study.
Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review of Health-Related Quality of Life in Women with HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with Trastuzumab.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2024Pooled it
- Health-related quality of life in Her2-positive early breast cancer woman using trastuzumab: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Health-Related Quality of Life following Total Thyroidectomy and Lobectomy for Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Pooled it
- Early interventions to prevent posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in survivors of life-threatening medical events: A systematic review.Journal of anxiety disorders · 2019Pooled it
- Effects and moderators of psychosocial interventions on quality of life, and emotional and social function in patients with cancer: An individual patient data meta-analysis of 22 RCTs.Psycho-oncology · 2018Pooled it
- Psychosocial interventions for fatigue during cancer treatment with palliative intent.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- The effectiveness of self-management support interventions for men with long-term conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2015Pooled it
- Psychosocial interventions for men with prostate cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Multidimensional rehabilitation programmes for adult cancer survivors.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Psychosocial interventions to improve quality of life and emotional wellbeing for recently diagnosed cancer patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Effects of a Cognitive Behavioral Digital Therapeutic on Anxiety and Depression Symptoms in Patients With Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.JCO oncology practice · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Screening and treatment of psychological distress in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: study protocol of the TES trial.BMC cancer · 2015Trial
- Trial
- Impact of hospitalisation on health-related quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2020Article
- Daily life and life quality 3 years following prostate cancer treatment.BMC nursing · 2013Article
- Psychosocial Interventions With Cognitive-Behavioral Components for the Treatment of Cancer-Related Traumatic Stress Symptoms: A Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of cognitive psychotherapy · 2013Review
- Enhanced involvement of general practitioners in cancer rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2012Article
- Effectiveness of Yoga on Quality of Life of Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy: A Randomized Clinical Controlled Study.Indian journal of palliative careArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare the effectiveness of individual support, group rehabilitation and a combination of the two in improving health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and psychological well-being in cancer patients during 24 months after diagnosis, as compared with standard care (SC). Furthermore, to compare the study sample and a random sample of the Swedish population with regard to HRQOL. A total of 481 consecutive patients, newly diagnosed with cancer, were randomly assigned to one of the four alternatives. Data on HRQOL and psychological well-being were collected at baseline and after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. The interventions did not improve HRQOL or psychological well-being, as compared with SC. At 3 months, the study sample reported an HRQOL comparable with the normal population. Many cancer patients are able to manage their cancer-related concerns with the support available from SC. However, it is reasonable to assume that the findings suffer from a lack of data from especially vulnerable patients and a possible Hawthorne effect. It cannot be concluded that cancer patients have no need for additional psychosocial interventions. Future projects should include screening and target interventions for those at risk for significant and prolonged psychological distress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.