Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19017725›Full record

ArticleHuman molecular genetics2009

Differential nuclear scaffold/matrix attachment marks expressed genes.

Amelia K Linnemann, Adrian E Platts, Stephen A Krawetz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human molecular genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Functional Aspects of Sperm Chromatin Organization.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amelia K LinnemannThe Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, C.S. Mott Center, Detroit, MI48201, USA.
Adrian E Platts
Stephen A Krawetz
Wayne State University · US

Funding

GENETIC MECHANISMS THAT POTENTIATE HUMAN SPERMATOGENESISR01HD036512 · NICHD · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KRAWETZ, STEPHEN A · 1999 to 2009
$2.1M
NICHD NIH HHS HD36512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well established that nuclear architecture plays a key role in poising regions of the genome for transcription. This may be achieved using scaffold/matrix attachment regions (S/MARs) that establish loop domains. However, the relationship between changes in the physical structure of the genome as mediated by attachment to the nuclear scaffold/matrix and gene expression is not clearly understood. To define the role of S/MARs in organizing our genome and to resolve the often contradictory loci-specific studies, we have surveyed the S/MARs in HeLa S3 cells on human chromosomes 14-18 by array comparative genomic hybridization. Comparison of LIS (lithium 3,5-diiodosalicylate) extraction to identify SARs and 2 m NaCl extraction to identify MARs revealed that approximately one-half of the sites were in common. The results presented in this study suggest that SARs 5' of a gene are associated with transcript presence whereas MARs contained within a gene are associated with silenced genes. The varied functions of the S/MARs as revealed by the different extraction methods highlights their unique functional contribution.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionMatrix Attachment RegionsChromosome MappingChromosomes, HumanHeLa CellsHumansNuclear MatrixProtein Binding

Identifiers

PMID19017725
PMCPMC2638830
OpenAlexW2097337492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.