Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19017610›Full record

ReviewJournal of lipid research2009

Structural and functional analysis of fatty acid-binding proteins.

Judith Storch, Lindsay McDermott

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of lipid research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 143 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
143citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

143 citing papers in PubMed, 292 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A secreted fatty acid- and retinol- binding protein frombioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

83 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Judith StorchDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Rutgers Center for Lipid Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA. storch@aesop.rutgers.edu
Lindsay McDermott
King's College London · GBRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Supplement to DK-38389 Lipid Transport in the IntestineR01DK038389 · NIDDK · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI SAMPATH, HARINI, STORCH, JUDITH · 1992 to 2025
$8.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK038389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian FA-binding proteins (FABPs) bind long-chain FA with high affinity. The large number of FABP types is suggestive of distinct functions in specific tissues. Multiple experimental approaches have shown that individual FABPs possess both unique and overlapping functions, some of which are based on specific elements in the protein structure. Although FA binding affinities for all FABPs tend to correlate directly with FA hydrophobicity, structure-function studies indicate that subtle three-dimensional changes that occur upon ligand binding may promote specific protein-protein or protein-membrane interactions that ultimately determine the function of each FABP. The conformational changes are focused in the FABP helical/portal domain, a region that was identified by in vitro studies to be vital for the FA transport properties of the FABPs. Thus, the FABPs modulate intracellular lipid homeostasis by regulating FA transport in the nuclear and extra-nuclear compartments of the cell; in so doing, they also impact systemic energy homeostasis.

Indexed as

AdipocytesAnimalsFatty Acid-Binding ProteinsHumansIntestinal MucosaKeratinocytesLiverOrgan SpecificityFatty Acid-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19017610
PMCPMC2674722
OpenAlexW2034937725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.