Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19015397›Full record

ArticleBlood2009

B-cell count and survival: differentiating chronic lymphocytic leukemia from monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis based on clinical outcome.

Tait D Shanafelt, Neil E Kay, Greg Jenkins, Timothy G Call, Clive S Zent, Diane F Jelinek, William G Morice, Justin Boysen, Liam Zakko, Susan Schwager and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Risk of Incident Melanoma Among Individuals With Low-Count Monoclonal B-Cell Lymphocytosis.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Methylation alteration ofOncotarget · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tait D ShanafeltMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. shanafelt.tait@mayo.edu
Neil E Kay
Greg Jenkins
Timothy G Call
Clive S Zent
Diane F Jelinek
William G Morice
Justin Boysen
Liam Zakko
Susan Schwager
Susan L Slager
Curtis A Hanson

Funding

Role of the BCR in B Cell Chronic Lymphocytic LeukemiaR01CA136591 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JELINEK, DIANE F · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
The Role of Oxidative Stress in CLL B-cell ApoptosisK23CA113408 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI SHANAFELT, TAIT D · 2006 to 2010
$631k
NCI NIH HHS CA 113408NCI NIH HHS K23 CA113408NCI NIH HHS R01 CA136591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in asymptomatic patients has historically been based on documenting a characteristic lymphocyte clone and the presence of lymphocytosis. There are minimal data regarding which lymphocyte parameter (absolute lymphocyte count [ALC] or B-cell count) and what threshold should be used for diagnosis. We analyzed the relationship of ALC and B-cell count with clinical outcome in 459 patients with a clonal population of CLL phenotype to determine (1) whether the CLL diagnosis should be based on ALC or B-cell count, (2) what lymphocyte threshold should be used for diagnosis, and (3) whether any lymphocyte count has independent prognostic value after accounting for biologic/molecular prognostic markers. B-cell count and ALC had similar value for predicting treatment-free survival (TFS) and overall survival as continuous variables, but as binary factors, a B-cell threshold of 11 x 10(9)/L best predicted survival. B-cell count remained an independent predictor of TFS after controlling for ZAP-70, IGHV, CD38, or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results (all P < .001). These analyses support basing the diagnosis of CLL on B-cell count and retaining the size of the B-cell count in the diagnostic criteria. Using clinically relevant criteria to distinguish between monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) and CLL could minimize patient distress caused by labeling asymptomatic people at low risk for adverse clinical consequences as having CLL.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorB-LymphocytesDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleFlow CytometryHumansImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellLymphocyte CountLymphocytosisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorImmunoglobulin Heavy Chains

Identifiers

PMID19015397
PMCPMC2676080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.