Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19014942›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology2009

Presentation and long-term follow-up of refractory celiac disease: comparison of type I with type II.

Georgia Malamut, Pauline Afchain, Virginie Verkarre, Thierry Lecomte, Aurélien Amiot, Diane Damotte, Yoram Bouhnik, Jean-Frédéric Colombel, Jean-Charles Delchier, Matthieu Allez and 10 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 370 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Colonic neoplasia and celiac disease: A systematic review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2013
    Guideline
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Liver Involvement in Celiac Disease and Immune-Mediated Diseases of the Small Bowel.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Georgia MalamutUniversité Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
Pauline Afchain
Virginie Verkarre
Thierry Lecomte
Aurélien Amiot
Diane Damotte
Yoram Bouhnik
Jean-Frédéric Colombel
Jean-Charles Delchier
Matthieu Allez
Jacques Cosnes
Anne Lavergne-Slove
Bertrand Meresse
Ludovic Trinquart
Elizabeth Macintyre
Isabelle Radford-Weiss
Olivier Hermine
Nicole Brousse
Nadine Cerf-Bensussan
Christophe Cellier
Université Paris Cité · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRHôpital Beaujon · FRHôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRHôpital Claude Huriez · FRHôpital Lariboisière · FRHôpital Saint-Antoine · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsRefractory celiac disease (RCD) was recently subdivided into 2 subtypes (RCD I and II) based on a normal or abnormal phenotype of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs), respectively. It is not clear, however, if these 2 entities differ in their presentation at diagnosis or long-term outcome. We compared the clinical and biological characteristics of RCD I and RCD II at diagnosis, the risk of developing an overt lymphoma, and the predictive factors of survival.

methodsMedical files of 14 patients with RCD I and 43 with RCD II were analyzed retrospectively. Predictive factors of overt lymphoma and survival were studied in univariate and multivariate analyses.

resultsAt diagnosis, malnutrition, ulcerative jejunitis, and lymphocytic gastritis were more common in patients with RCD II than RCD I (P< .05). Overt lymphomas occurred in 2 patients with RCD I and 16 with RCD II. In the univariate analysis, abnormal IEL phenotype and increased age at diagnosis of RCD were predictive factors for overt lymphoma. Abnormal IEL phenotype (P< .01), clonality (P= .01), and overt lymphoma (P= .001) predicted short survival time. Only abnormal IEL phenotype (P= .03) and overt lymphoma (P= .04) were predictive in the multivariate analysis. The 5-year survival rate was 93% in patients with RCD I and 44% with RCD II.

conclusionsRCD II has a much more severe presentation and prognosis than patients with RCD I; <44% of patients with RCD II survive 5 years after diagnosis. Abnormal IEL phenotype is a predictive factor but not a necessary condition for the development of overt lymphoma.

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex HormonesAdultCD3 ComplexCD8 AntigensCeliac DiseaseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedSurvival RateAdrenal Cortex HormonesCD3 ComplexCD8 Antigens

Identifiers

PMID19014942
OpenAlexW1980839459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.