ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2008
A comprehensive analysis of prognostic signatures reveals the high predictive capacity of the proliferation, immune response and RNA splicing modules in breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative study of joint analysis of microarray gene expression data in survival prediction and risk assessment of breast cancer patients.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2016Pooled it
- Genome-wide association analysis identifies three new breast cancer susceptibility loci.Nature genetics · 2012Pooled it
- CD8+ lymphocyte infiltration is an independent favorable prognostic indicator in basal-like breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2012Trial
- 70-Gene signature-guided adjuvant systemic treatment adjustments in early-stage ER+ breast cancer patients: 7-year follow-up of a prospective multicenter cohort study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Pathway-structured predictive modeling for multi-level drug response in multiple myeloma.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- New tools for old drugs: Functional genetic screens to optimize current chemotherapy.Drug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy · 2018Review
- Impact of intra-tumoral IL17A and IL32 gene expression on T-cell responses and lymph node status in breast cancer patients.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2017Article
- The CINSARC signature as a prognostic marker for clinical outcome in multiple neoplasms.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Pathway-Structured Predictive Model for Cancer Survival Prediction: A Two-Stage Approach.Genetics · 2017Article
- Validation of the 18-gene classifier as a prognostic biomarker of distant metastasis in breast cancer.PloS one · 2017Article
- Gene signature combinations improve prognostic stratification of multiple myeloma patients.Leukemia · 2016Article
- Article
- The influence of cancer tissue sampling on the identification of cancer characteristics.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- The histone chaperone HJURP is a new independent prognostic marker for luminal A breast carcinoma.Molecular oncology · 2015Article
- Article
- Expression of a-Tocopherol-Associated protein (TAP) is associated with clinical outcome in breast cancer patients.BMC clinical pathology · 2015Article
- Article
- A novel model to combine clinical and pathway-based transcriptomic information for the prognosis prediction of breast cancer.PLoS computational biology · 2014Article
- Predictive performance of microarray gene signatures: impact of tumor heterogeneity and multiple mechanisms of drug resistance.Cancer research · 2014Article
- Systematic assessment of prognostic gene signatures for breast cancer shows distinct influence of time and ER status.BMC cancer · 2014Article
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSeveral gene expression signatures have been proposed and demonstrated to be predictive of outcome in breast cancer. In the present article we address the following issues: Do these signatures perform similarly? Are there (common) molecular processes reported by these signatures? Can better prognostic predictors be constructed based on these identified molecular processes?
methodsWe performed a comprehensive analysis of the performance of nine gene expression signatures on seven different breast cancer datasets. To better characterize the functional processes associated with these signatures, we enlarged each signature by including all probes with a significant correlation to at least one of the genes in the original signature. The enrichment of functional groups was assessed using four ontology databases.
resultsThe classification performance of the nine gene expression signatures is very similar in terms of assigning a sample to either a poor outcome group or a good outcome group. Nevertheless the concordance in classification at the sample level is low, with only 50% of the breast cancer samples classified in the same outcome group by all classifiers. The predictive accuracy decreases with the number of poor outcome assignments given to a sample. The best classification performance was obtained for the group of patients with only good outcome assignments. Enrichment analysis of the enlarged signatures revealed 11 functional modules with prognostic ability. The combination of the RNA-splicing and immune modules resulted in a classifier with high prognostic performance on an independent validation set.
conclusionsThe study revealed that the nine signatures perform similarly but exhibit a large degree of discordance in prognostic group assignment. Functional analyses indicate that proliferation is a common cellular process, but that other functional categories are also enriched and show independent prognostic ability. We provide new evidence of the potentially promising prognostic impact of immunity and RNA-splicing processes in breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.