ArticleJournal of ovarian research2008
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and prophylactic human embryo cryopreservation: analysis of reproductive outcome following thawed embryo transfer.
Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Major Factors Affecting the Live Birth Rate After Frozen Embryo Transfer Among Young Women.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Article
- Outcome Analysis of Day-3 Frozen Embryo Transfer v/s Fresh Embryo Transfer in Infertility: A Prospective Therapeutic Study in Indian Scenario.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2016Article
- A Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Local Endometrial Injury on the Clinical Pregnancy Rate of Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles in Patients With Repeated Implantation Failure.Journal of family & reproductive health · 2016Article
- Evaluation of clinical factors influencing pregnancy rate in frozen embryo transfer.Iranian journal of reproductive medicine · 2014Article
- Fertility drugs, reproductive strategies and ovarian cancer risk.Journal of ovarian research · 2014Review
- Predicting and preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): the need for individualized not standardized treatment.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2012Review
- Pronuclear embryo cryopreservation experience: outcomes for reducing the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and for fertility preservation in cancer patients.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2011Article
- Correlation between embryological factors and pregnancy rate: development of an embryo score in a cryopreservation programme.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2011Article
- Determining the status of non-transferred embryos in Ireland: a conspectus of case law and implications for clinical IVF practice.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2009Article
- Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: current views on pathophysiology, risk factors, prevention, and management.Journal of experimental & clinical assisted reproduction · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo review utilisation of elective embryo cryopreservation in the expectant management of patients at risk for developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), and report on reproductive outcome following transfer of thawed embryos. MATERIALS AND
methodsMedical records were reviewed for patients undergoing IVF from 2000-2008 to identify cases at risk for OHSS where cryopreservation was electively performed on all embryos at the 2 pn stage. Patient age, total number of oocytes retrieved, number of 2 pn embryos cryopreserved, interval between retrieval and thaw/transfer, number (and developmental stage) of embryos transferred (ET), and delivery rate after IVF were recorded for all patients.
resultsFrom a total of 2892 IVF cycles undertaken during the study period, 51 IVF cases (1.8%) were noted where follicle number exceeded 20 and pelvic fluid collection was present. Elective embryo freeze was performed as OHSS prophylaxis in each instance. Mean (+/- SD) age of these patients was 32 +/- 3.8 yrs. Average number of oocytes retrieved in this group was 23 +/- 8.7, which after fertilisation yielded an average of 14 +/- 5.7 embryos cryopreserved per patient. Thaw and ET was performed an average of 115 +/- 65 d (range 30-377 d) after oocyte retrieval with a mean of 2 +/- 0.6 embryos transferred. Grow-out to blastocyst stage was achieved in 88.2% of cases. Delivery/livebirth rate was 33.3% per initiated cycle and 43.6% per transfer. Non-transferred blastocysts remained in cryostorage for 24 of 51 patients (46.1%) after ET, with an average of 3 +/- 3 blastocysts refrozen per patient.
conclusionOHSS prophylaxis was used in 1.8% of IVF cycles at this institution; no serious OHSS complications were encountered during the study period. Management based on elective 2 pn embryo cryopreservation with subsequent thaw and grow-out to blastocyst stage for transfer did not appear to compromise embryo viability or overall reproductive outcome. For these patients, immediate elective embryo cryopreservation and delay of ET by as little as 30 d allowed for satisfactory conclusion of the IVF sequence, yielding a livebirth-delivery rate (per ET) >40%.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.