Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19012091›Full record

ArticleEthnicity & health2009

Patient-provider race-concordance: does it matter in improving minority patients' health outcomes?

Salimah H Meghani, Jacqueline M Brooks, Trina Gipson-Jones, Roberta Waite, Lisa Whitfield-Harris, Janet A Deatrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ethnicity & health, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Do community health worker interventions improve rates of screening mammography in the United States? A systematic review.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2011
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. The effect of patient-provider communication on medication adherence in hypertensive black patients: does race concordance matter?Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2012
    Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Risk factors of genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder among Black women in the United States: A conceptual review.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Female representation in the Canadian physician anesthesia workforce: a historical analysis.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025
    Article

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Salimah H MeghaniNewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA. meghanis@nursing.upenn.edu
Jacqueline M Brooks
Trina Gipson-Jones
Roberta Waite
Lisa Whitfield-Harris
Janet A Deatrick

Funding

ADVANCED TRAINING IN NURSING OUTCOMES RESEARCHT32NR007104 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JACQUELINE MARGO BROOKS CARTHON, EILEEN T LAKE · 1999 to 2026
$11.6M
NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand if patient-provider race-concordance is associated with improved health outcomes for minorities.

designA comprehensive review of published research literature (1980-2008) using MEDLINE, HealthSTAR, and CINAHL databases were conducted. Studies were included if they had at least one research question examining the effect of patient-provider race-concordance on minority patients' health outcomes and pertained to minorities in the USA. The database search and data analysis were each independently conducted by two authors. The review was limited to data analysis in tabular and text format. A meta-analysis was not possible due to the discrepancy in methods and outcomes across studies.

resultsTwenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Combined, the studies were based on data from 56,276 patients and only 1,756 providers. Whites/Caucasians (37.6%) and Blacks/African Americans (31.5%), followed by Hispanics/Latinos (13.3%), and Asians/Pacific Islanders (4.3%) comprised the majority of the patient sample. The median sample of providers was only 16 for African Americans, 10 for Asians and two for Hispanics. The review presented mixed results. Of the 27 studies, patient-provider race-concordance was associated with positive health outcomes for minorities in only nine studies (33%), while eight studies (30%) found no association of race-concordance with the outcomes studied and 10 (37%) presented mixed findings. Analysis suggested that having a provider of same race did not improve 'receipt of services' for minorities. No clear pattern of findings emerged in the domains of healthcare utilization, patient-provider communication, preference, satisfaction, or perception of respect.

conclusionsThere is inconclusive evidence to support that patient-provider race-concordance is associated with positive health outcomes for minorities. Studies were limited to four racial/ethnic groups and generally employed small samples of minorities. Further research is needed to understand what health outcomes may be more sensitive to cultural proximity between patients and providers, and what patient, provider and setting-level variables may moderate or mediate these outcomes.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesMinority HealthProfessional-Patient RelationsAttitude to HealthHumansSocial Perception

Identifiers

PMID19012091
PMCPMC3209820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.