ArticleMaternal and child health journal2010
Intermediate outcomes, strategies, and challenges of eight healthy start projects.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved birth weight for Black infants: outcomes of a Healthy Start program.American journal of public health · 2014Trial
- Listening visits: an evaluation of the effectiveness and acceptability of a home-based depression treatment.Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research · 2010Trial
- The Dutch Solid Start program: describing the implementation and experiences of the program's first thousand days.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Examining the Prevalence of Peripartum Depressive Symptoms in a Border Community.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- Associations Between a Healthy Start Program Prenatal Risk Screening Tool and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Study Using the Mother/Infant Dyad Screening Cohort.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2020Article
- Evaluation of the Implementation of the Healthy Start Program: Findings from the 2016 National Healthy Start Program Survey.Maternal and child health journal · 2019Article
- Design and Operation of the Transformed National Healthy Start Evaluation.Maternal and child health journal · 2017Article
- Reported Systems Changes and Sustainability Perceptions of Three State Departments of Health Implementing Multi-Faceted Evidence-Based Fall Prevention Efforts.Frontiers in public health · 2017Article
- Societal Valorisation of New Knowledge to Improve Perinatal Health: Time to Act.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2016Article
- Providers' Perspectives on Case Management of a Healthy Start Program: A Qualitative Study.PloS one · 2016Article
- Perinatal program evaluations: methods, impacts, and future goals.Maternal and child health journal · 2015Review
- Selected findings from the cross-site evaluation of the Federal Healthy Start Program.Maternal and child health journal · 2015Article
- Use of competency-based self-assessments and the MCH navigator for MCH workforce development: three states' experiences.Maternal and child health journal · 2015Article
- Supporting replication and scale-up of evidence-based home visiting programs: assessing the implementation knowledge base.American journal of public health · 2014Article
- Moving toward evidence-based federal Healthy Start program evaluations: accounting for bias in birth outcomes studies.American journal of public health · 2014Article
- Pregnancy and birth outcome improvements for American Indians in the Healthy Start project of the Inter-Tribal Council of Michigan, 1998-2008.Maternal and child health journal · 2013Article
- Perinatal depression screening in healthy start: an evaluation of the acceptability of technical assistance consultation.Community mental health journal · 2013Article
- The impact of SLHS program on perinatal indicators.Maternal and child health journal · 2013Article
- Provider cultural competency, client satisfaction, and engagement in home-based programs to treat child abuse and neglect.Child maltreatment · 2012Article
- Characteristics, access, utilization, satisfaction, and outcomes of healthy start participants in eight sites.Maternal and child health journal · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Site visits were conducted for the evaluation of the national Healthy Start program to gain an understanding of how projects design and implement five service components (outreach, case management, health education, depression screening and interconceptional care) and four system components (consortium, coordination/collaboration, local health system action plan and sustainability) as well as program staff's perceptions of these components' influence on intermediate outcomes. Interviews with project directors, case managers, local evaluators, clinicians, consortium members, outreach/lay workers and other stakeholders were conducted during 3-day in-depth site visits with eight Healthy Start grantees. Grantees reported that both services and systems components were related to self-reported service achievements (e.g. earlier entry into prenatal care) and systems achievements (e.g. consumer involvement). Outreach, case management, and health education were perceived as the service components that contributed most to their achievements while consortia was perceived as the most influential systems component in reaching their goals. Furthermore, cultural competence and community voice were overarching project components that addressed racial/ethnic disparities. Finally, there was great variability across sites regarding the challenges they faced, with poor service availability and limited funding the two most frequently reported. Service provision and systems development are both critical for successful Healthy Start projects to achieve intermediate program outcomes. Unique contextual and community issues influence Healthy Start project design, implementation and reported accomplishments. All eight projects implement the required program components yet outreach, case management, and health education are cited most frequently for contributing to their perceived achievements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.