Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19009924›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique

[Evaluation of the efficacy of the Toxoplasma gondii screening program among pregnant women in Nunavik, 1994-2003].

Elaine Lavoie, Benoit Lévesque, Jean-François Proulx, Jennifer Grant, Angéla Davys Ndassebe, Suzanne Gingras, Bruno Hubert, Michael Libman

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Foxes (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elaine LavoieUnité de recherche en santé publique, Centre de Recherche du CHUL, Québec.
Benoit Lévesque
Jean-François Proulx
Jennifer Grant
Angéla Davys Ndassebe
Suzanne Gingras
Bruno Hubert
Michael Libman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives(1) To evaluate the efficacy of the Toxoplasma gondii screening program among Nunavik pregnant women in identifying seroconversions during pregnancy and performing an appropriate follow-up of the seroconverted women and their child; and (2) to evaluate the consequences of congenital Toxoplasma gondii infection.

participantsWomen of child-bearing age and their children born between January 1994 and September 2003.

settingNunavik.

interventionPotential cases of infection during pregnancy and of congenital toxoplasmosis were identified on the basis of serologic and hospitalization data. A medical chart revision was then performed. Descriptive statistics regarding the medical follow-up and treatment of suspected cases were compiled. OUTCOMES: 31 women who gave birth to 32 children were identified as potential cases. According to the medical charts, 19 women had a potential infection during pregnancy, the others were deemed to have been infected before conception. One woman had a definite infection. This woman and most of the 18 other potentially infected women and their children were treated appropriately. Because of missing data, it was impossible to determine with certainty the final status of two children. A diagnosis of congenital infection was rejected among the other children.

conclusionWomen with suspected infection and their children were generally well managed by the health care system. No clinical effect of congenital toxoplasmosis was noted during the studied period.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningProgram EvaluationCanadaFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy Complications, ParasiticSerologic TestsTime FactorsToxoplasmosisToxoplasmosis, Congenital

Identifiers

PMID19009924
PMCPMC6976170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.