Trial reportEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics
The influence of lamivudine, stavudine and nevirapine on the pharmacokinetics of chlorpropamide in human subjects.
Trial report in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The influence of Nifadin, Niprisan and Niprd/92/001/1-1 (AM-1) on the pharmacokinetics of metronidazole in rats.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic patients tend to be prone to infections, and multiple drug therapy cannot be ruled out in the management of diabetes. The effect of three routinely prescribed antiretroviral (ARV) drugs on the pharmacokinetic profile of an antidiabetic drug, chlorpropamide, was investigated in 18 human subjects, who had recently been diagnosed positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. The volunteers, aged 22-44 years and weighing 59-66 kg, were randomized into three groups with six subjects in each group. The study was carried out in two phases; in the first phase, all the subjects received chlorpropamide (250 mg) in a fasting state. In the second phase, the subjects received 250 mg of chlorpropamide together with lamivudine (150 mg) or stavudine (40 mg) or nevirapine (200 mg) in a fasting state. Chlorpropamide concentrations in the plasma were determined using a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method developed earlier in our laboratory, while plasma glucose levels were determined using the standard glucose oxidase method. Lamivudine and stavudine decreased significantly (P < 0.05) the mean maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-168h)) of chlorpropamide, while both drugs significantly increased the absorption half-life (t(1/2ab)) and elimination half-life (t(1/2el). the apparent volume of distribution (Vd) and the plasma clearance rate (Cl) of chlorpropamide (P < 0.05). The plasma glucose levels were also significantly increased between 0.5 - 4 h post dose (P < 0.05). However, it was found that the pharmacokinetic parameters of chlorpropamide and the blood glucose levels were not significantly altered by the co-administration with nevirapine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.