Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19005620›Full record

ReviewCellular & molecular biology letters2009

Oral cyclosporine A--the current picture of its liposomal and other delivery systems.

Aleksander Czogalla

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular & molecular biology letters, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review of two immunosuppressants: tacrolimus and cyclosporine.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2023
    Review
  11. Exploring LIPIDs for their potential to improves bioavailability of lipophilic drugs candidates: A review.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Drug transport by red blood cells.Frontiers in physiology · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Cyclosporin A: Conformational Complexity and Chameleonicity.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2021
    Article
  17. Repurpose but also (nano)-reformulate! The potential role of nanomedicine in the battle against SARS-CoV2.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Aleksander CzogallaResearch and Development Centre Novasome Sp. Z O.O., ul. Olsztyńska 5, 51-423 Wrocław, Poland. a.czogalla@hasco-lek.pl

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of cyclosporine A was a milestone in organ transplantation and the treatment of autoimmune diseases. However, developing an efficient oral delivery system for this drug is complicated by its poor biopharmaceutical characteristics (low solubility and permeability) and the need to carefully monitor its levels in the blood. Current research is exploring various approaches, including those based on emulsions, microspheres, nanoparticles, and liposomes. Although progress has been made, none of the formulations is flawless. This review is a brief description of the main pharmaceutical systems and devices that have been described for the oral delivery of cyclosporine A in the context of the physicochemical properties of the drug and the character of its interactions with lipid membranes.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAdministration, OralCyclosporineHumansLipid BilayersLiposomesCyclosporineLipid BilayersLiposomes

Identifiers

PMID19005620
PMCPMC6275704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.