Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19005611›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2009

Tension-free open hernia repair using an innovative self-gripping semi-resorbable mesh.

P Chastan

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00960011 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Study of Self Gripping Semi-resorbable Mesh (PROGRIP) With Polypropylene Mesh in Open Inguinal Hernia Repair - the 6 Years Result

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2009 to 2016Enrolled58ConditionsHernia, InguinalArmsPROGRIP, POLYPROPYLENE
NCT01421602 completednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Observational Study on the Use of a Self Fixating Lightweight Polyester Mesh in Open Inguinal Hernia

TypeobservationalSponsorDe La Salle University Medical CenterRan2011 to 2015Enrolled99ConditionsHernia, Inguinal
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Uniformity of Chronic Pain Assessment after Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Critical Review of the Literature.European surgical research. Europaische chirurgische Forschung. Recherches chirurgicales europeennes · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. History of the Creation of Self-Gripping Mesh.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Efficacy comparison between ProGrip self-gripping mesh and polypropylene mesh for retromuscular repair of incisional hernias].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A novel sutureless colonic anastomosis with self-gripping mesh: an experimental model.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

P ChastanPolyclinique Bordeaux Rive Droite, Rue Edouard Herriot, 33310 Lormont, France. Chastan@wanadoo.fr

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLichtenstein tension-free mesh repair is the most commonly used technique for the open treatment of inguinal hernia. Mesh fixation and the potential risk of associated pain are always a surgical concern. The aim of this study was to report the initial clinical experience using an innovative, partly resorbable mesh with self-gripping properties.

methodsFifty-two patients (70 hernias) underwent open Lichtenstein hernia repair with Parietene Progrip (Sofradim Production, Trévoux, France-Group Covidien). Patient pain as measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS) was the primary study endpoint. Clinical evaluation, with careful attention to the identification of hernia recurrence, was performed at 1 month and 1 year. The evaluation of fixation precision, quality of fixation and ease of use was assessed by the primary surgeon.

resultsThe mean patient pain was 1.3 (+/-1.4) at discharge, 0.1 (+/-0.4) at 1 month and 0.0 (+/-0.1) (one patient with VAS 1/10) at 1 year, respectively. The mean operative time was 19 +/- 4 min. There was one minor cutaneous infection and no documented recurrence. The quality of the gripping effect was rated very good in 51 (98.1%) of the cases performed.

conclusionThe use of a novel low-density, macroporous mesh with semi-resorbable self-fixing properties during tension-free repair may be a satisfactory solution to the clinical problems of pain and recurrence following inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Indexed as

Surgical MeshAnesthesiaHernia, InguinalHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPolypropylenesPostoperative PainProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignProsthesis ImplantationRecovery of FunctionRecurrencePolypropylenes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.