ArticleThe American journal of bioethics : AJOB2008
Identifiability of DNA data: the need for consistent federal policy.
Article in The American journal of bioethics : AJOB, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on privacy and genetic information in the United States.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- Methods for safely sharing dual-use genetic data.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Human embryos and eggs: from long-term storage to biobanking.Monash bioethics review · 2015Article
- IRB practices and policies regarding the secondary research use of biospecimens.BMC medical ethics · 2015Article
- Gay and Bisexual Men's Perceptions of the Donation and Use of Human Biological Samples for Research: A Qualitative Study.PloS one · 2015Article
- Identifying genetic relatives without compromising privacy.Genome research · 2014Article
- Translating personalized medicine using new genetic technologies in clinical practice: the ethical issues.Personalized medicine · 2014Article
- Biobanking, consent, and certificates of confidentiality: does the ANPRM muddy the water?The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2013Article
- How anonymous is 'anonymous'? Some suggestions towards a coherent universal coding system for genetic samples.Journal of medical ethics · 2012Article
- Public perspectives regarding data-sharing practices in genomics research.Public health genomics · 2011Article
- Informed consent in genomics and genetic research.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2010Review
- Eyes wide open: the personal genome project, citizen science and veracity in informed consent.Personalized medicine · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.