Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19003543›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2009

Conivaptan for hyponatremia in the neurocritical care unit.

Wendy L Wright, William H Asbury, Jane L Gilmore, Owen B Samuels

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03000283 (Conivaptan for the Reduction of Cerebral Edema in Intracerebral Hemorrhage- A Safety and Tolerability Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03000283 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Conivaptan for the Reduction of Cerebral Edema in Intracerebral Hemorrhage- A Safety and Tolerability Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorJesse CorryRan2017 to 2019Enrolled7ConditionsCerebral Hemorrhage, Cerebral Edema, Intracerebral Hemorrhage, StrokeArmsConivaptan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Efficacy of conivaptan and hypertonic (3%) saline in treating hyponatremia due to syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone in a tertiary Intensive Care Unit.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sodium and fluid management in acute brain injury.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2012
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Intensive care unit management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2012
    Article
  13. Novel treatment targets for cerebral edema.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2012
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Conivaptan and its role in the treatment of hyponatremia.Drug design, development and therapy · 2009
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wendy L WrightDepartment of Neurology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA. wendy.wright@emoryhealthcare.org
William H Asbury
Jane L Gilmore
Owen B Samuels
Emory University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionConivaptan is the first arginine vasopressin antagonist to be FDA-approved for the treatment of euvolemic hyponatremia, a common complication in neurointensive care patients. Due to risks for cerebral edema and seizures, sodium levels are generally aggressively maintained within normal levels (135-145 meq/l) in this patient population.

objectiveTo assess the safety and efficacy of conivaptan for the treatment of euvolemic hyponatremia in the neurocritical care unit.

methodsData were obtained retrospectively on 22 patients treated with conivaptan for euvolemic hyponatremia. End points evaluated included time to [Na] increase of >or=6 meq/l; incidences of rapid overcorrection of [Na] (defined as an increase of >12 meq/l in a 24-h period while on conivaptan), infusion site reactions, or other adverse events; and whether sodium levels decreased after discontinuation of conivaptan.

resultsA [Na] increase of >or=6 meq/l was reached in 19/22 (86%) patients, with an average time to goal of 13.1 h. No patients experienced a rapid overcorrection of [Na]. Five patients had an infusion site reaction necessitating an IV change. One patient experienced hypotension and another complained of thirst during infusion. Conivaptan was initiated in 11/22 patients (50%) who were hyponatremic despite already being on conventional therapies.

conclusionConivaptan was safe and effective in this small series of neurointensive care patients, including many patients who were hyponatremic despite traditional treatments to maintain normal sodium levels. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of conivaptan as an adjunctive and/or alternative therapy for hyponatremia in this patient population.

Indexed as

Antidiuretic Hormone Receptor AntagonistsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBenzazepinesBlood VolumeCritical CareDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansHyponatremiaInappropriate ADH SyndromeMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, VasopressinAntidiuretic Hormone Receptor AntagonistsBenzazepinesconivaptanReceptors, VasopressinSodium

Identifiers

PMID19003543
OpenAlexW2024060207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.