ArticleCytotechnology2004
Stem cells: From embryology to cellular therapy? An appraisal of the present state of art.
Article in Cytotechnology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in the Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Diverse geroprotectors differently affect a mechanism linking cellular aging to cellular quiescence in budding yeast.Oncotarget · 2022Article
- Review
- Skeletogenic Capacity of Human Perivascular Stem Cells Obtained Via Magnetic-Activated Cell Sorting.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2019Article
- Quiescence Entry, Maintenance, and Exit in Adult Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Neuroprotective Effects of Bioactive Compounds and MAPK Pathway Modulation in "Ischemia"-Stressed PC12 Pheochromocytoma Cells.Brain sciences · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abtractA series of publications has dealt in the last years with topics as the isolation, properties and applications of animal stem cells (Weissman 2000. Cell 100: 157-168; Weissman 2002. N. Engl. J. Med. 346: 1567-1579; Lovell-Badge 2001. Nature 414: 88-91; Marshak et al. 2001. Stem Cell Biology. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New york; Eridani 2002. J. Roy. Soc. Med. 95: 5-8; Borge and Evers 2003. Cytotechnology 41: 59-68; Sgaramella 2003. Cytotechnology 41: 69-73), however, the bonanza of experimental data recently accumulating have raised such an amount of controversial views and discussions that time perhaps has come for a reassessment of the basic facts in this peculiar area of research and an evaluation of possible, not unrealistic, implications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.