Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19003204›Full record

ArticleCytotechnology2003

Isolation and Characterization of Subpopulations of Rat Ascites Hepatoma Cell Line of AH109A with Different Metastatic Potentials.

Yutaka Miura, Miyako Ariga, Maiko Miyauchi, Katsuhiko Arai, Kazumi Yagasaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytotechnology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yutaka MiuraDepartment of Applied Biological Science, Tokyo Noko Univeristy, Fuchu, Tokyo, 183-8509, Japan, eiyouym@cc.tuat.ac.jp.
Miyako Ariga
Maiko Miyauchi
Katsuhiko Arai
Kazumi Yagasaki

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rat ascites hepatoma cell line of AH109A proved to be divided into two subpopulations with different invasive and metastatic potentials, when cultured in the medium containing allogeneic rat sera. One population adheres to the culture dish, actively extending pseudopodia, and the other remains in a floating state. Utilizing this character, we have separated these two populations. After three successive separation steps, adhesive AH109A cells and floating AH109A cells were obtained. Adhesive AH109A cells proliferated more rapidly and invaded more actively than did floating AH109A cells. Adhesive AH109A cells metastasized mainly to lung, while floating AH109A cells to mesentery, when intravenously injected into tail veins. Histological studies revealed that adhesive AH109A cells showed lymphatic metastases to lung. These results suggest that the two populations separated from parental AH109A cells provide good models for the study of tumor invasion and tissue-specific metastasis and that adhesive AH109A cells can be used for the creation of lymphatic metastasis model of rats.

Identifiers

PMID19003204
PMCPMC3449591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.