Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19003074›Full record

ArticleCytotechnology2006

Current status of transcriptional regulation systems.

Tobias May, Hansjörg Hauser, Dagmar Wirth

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytotechnology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tobias MayDepartment of Gene Regulation and Differentiation, GBF-German Research Center for Biotechnology, Mascheroder Weg 1, Braunschweig, D-38124, Germany.
Hansjörg Hauser
Dagmar Wirth
German Center for Infection Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many attempts have been undertaken to control transgene activity in mammalian cells. This is of importance for both applied biotechnology and basic research activities. State of the art regulatory systems use elements for transgene regulation which are unrelated to host regulatory networks and thus do not interfere with endogenous activities. Most of these regulation systems consist of transregulators and transregulator responding promoter elements that are derived from non mammalian origin. Apart from the tetracycline (Tet) regulated system which is most widely used for conditional gene expression at the moment, a number of new systems were created. These systems have been significantly refined and their performance makes them suitable for regulating transgenes not only in cellular systems but also in transgenic animals and for human therapeutic use.

Identifiers

PMID19003074
PMCPMC3476005
OpenAlexW1974997842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.