ArticleCytotechnology2006
Identity tests: determination of cell line cross-contamination.
Article in Cytotechnology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Authentication of RBK (Razi Bovine Kidney) Cell Line Derived from Primary Kidney Cell.Archives of Razi Institute · 2025Article
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cell Lines: Reliable Alternatives to Primary Nasopharyngeal Cells?Cells · 2024Article
- Review
- Cell Proteomic Footprinting: Advances in the Quality of Cellular and Cell-Derived Cancer Vaccines.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- A Multistep Workflow to Evaluate Newly Generated iPSCs and Their Ability to Generate Different Cell Types.Methods and protocols · 2021Article
- Identification of Iranian BHK-21-C5 Cell Line by Two Steps Polymerase Chain Reaction.Archives of Razi Institute · 2021Article
- Antigenic Essence: Upgrade of Cellular Cancer Vaccines.Cancers · 2021Review
- In Vitro Differentiation of Tumor-Associated Macrophages from Monocyte Precursors with Modified Melanoma-Conditioned Medium.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Genomic characterization of five commonly used endometrial cancer cell lines.International journal of oncology · 2020Article
- SANTAVACVaccines · 2019Review
- Rapid detection of low-level HeLa cell contamination in cell culture using nested PCR.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2019Article
- Effective Combination Therapies for B-cell Lymphoma Predicted by a Virtual Disease Model.Cancer research · 2017Article
- Guidelines for preclinical and early phase clinical assessment of novel radiosensitisers.British journal of cancer · 2011Review
- Cellular cancer vaccines: an update on the development of vaccines generated from cell surface antigens.Journal of Cancer · 2010Article
- Silencing of autocrine motility factor induces mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition and suppression of osteosarcoma pulmonary metastasis.Cancer research · 2010Article
- Bacteriophages as model organisms for virus emergence research.Trends in microbiology · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell line cross-contamination is a phenomenon that arises as a result of the continuous cell line culture. It has been estimated that around 20% of the cell lines are misidentified, therefore it is necessary to carry out quality control tests for the detection of this issue. Since cell line cross-contamination discovery, different methods have been applied, such as isoenzyme analysis for inter-species cross-contamination; HLA typing, and DNA fingerprinting using short tandem repeat and a variable number of tandem repeat for intra-species cross-contamination. The cell banks in this sense represent the organizations responsible for guaranteeing the authenticity of cell lines for future research and clinical uses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.