ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2009
Carbohydrate and fat metabolism related to blood lactate in boys and male adolescents.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- High cycling cadence reduces carbohydrate oxidation at given low intensity metabolic rate.Biology of sport · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The half maximal constant (k (el)) of the relative rate of carbohydrate oxidation (relCHO) was individually approximated (relCHO = 100/(1 + k (el)/BLC(2)) as a function of the blood lactate concentration (BLC) in 11 pre-pubertal boys and 11 male adolescents (age: 11.6 +/- 0.1 vs. 16.4 +/- 0.2 years, height: 151.6 +/- 1.7 vs. 182.4 +/- 2.3 cm, body mass: 38.2 +/- 1.1 vs. 68.7 +/- 2.3 kg, all P < 0.001) during incremental cycle ergometry. k (el) explained 89.0 +/- 2.2 and 91.9 +/- 2.2% of the variance of the reliance on CHO in boys and adolescents respectively (both P < 0.001). No difference in k (el) [1.34 +/- 0.40 vs. 1.48 +/- 0.30 (mmol l(-1))(2)] was found between boys and adolescents. The BLC was lower (P < 0.05) in boys when relCHO was higher than 91.2 +/- 2.1 and 92.1 +/- 1.3% in boys and adolescents respectively. This seems to explain why the reliance on CHO and the BLC are independent of maturation in the moderate and heavy exercise intensity domain and the BLC but not the relCHO which is higher under severe and maximal exercise conditions in more mature subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.