Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19002122›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2008

Validated questionnaires for assessing sexual dysfunction and BPH/LUTS: solidifying the common pathophysiologic link.

R C Rosen, A D Seftel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of impotence research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R C RosenNew England Research Institutes, Watertown, MA 02472, USA. rrosen@neriscience.com
A D Seftel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Erectile dysfunction (ED) and benign prostatic hyperplasia/lower urinary tract symptoms (BPH/LUTS) share many epidemiologic and clinical similarities. First-line therapy for both conditions include oral medications (alpha blockers, phosphodiesterase inhibitors). The impetus to develop and use questionnaires to characterize these two conditions is based on the trend away from invasive diagnostic testing to the use of patient-reported outcomes or validated self-administered questionnaires. The International Prostate Symptom Score, the International Index of Erectile Function, the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ) and the MSHQ short form are similar patient-reported assessment questionnaires used for research or clinical evaluation of BPH/LUTS, ED and ejaculatory dysfunction. These patient-based self-administered questionnaires are likely to assume an ever increasing important role in the future, as oral BPH therapies are considered for the treatment of ED and oral ED therapies are considered for the treatment of BPH/LUTS.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesHumansMalePhosphodiesterase InhibitorsProstatic HyperplasiaSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalUrologic DiseasesPhosphodiesterase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID19002122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.