Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19001430›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2009

Root signals and stomatal closure in relation to photosynthesis, chlorophyll a fluorescence and adventitious rooting of flooded tomato plants.

Mark A Else, Franciszek Janowiak, Christopher J Atkinson, Michael B Jackson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark A ElseEast Malling Research, East Malling, Kent ME19 6BJ, UK.
Franciszek Janowiak
Christopher J Atkinson
Michael B Jackson
East Malling Research (United Kingdom) · GBFranciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology · PLUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsAn investigation was carried out to determine whether stomatal closure in flooded tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum) results from decreased leaf water potentials (psi(L)), decreased photosynthetic capacity and attendant increases in internal CO(2) (C(i)) or from losses of root function such as cytokinin and gibberellin export.

methodsPot-grown plants were flooded when 1 month old. Leaf conductance was measured by diffusion porometry, the efficiency of photosystem II (PSII) was estimated by fluorimetry, and infrared gas analysis was used to determine C(i) and related parameters. KEY

resultsFlooding starting in the morning closed the stomata and increased psi(L) after a short-lived depression of psi(L). The pattern of closure remained unchanged when psi(;L) depression was avoided by starting flooding at the end rather than at the start of the photoperiod. Raising external CO(2) concentrations by 100 micromol mol(-1) also closed stomata rapidly. Five chlorophyll fluorescence parameters [F(q)'/F(m)', F(q)'/F(v)', F(v)'/F(m)', non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) and F(v)/F(m)] were affected by flooding within 12-36 h and changes were linked to decreased C(i). Closing stomata by applying abscisic acid or increasing external CO(2) substantially reproduced the effects of flooding on chlorophyll fluorescence. The presence of well-aerated adventitious roots partially inhibited stomatal closure of flooded plants. Allowing adventitious roots to form on plants flooded for >3 d promoted some stomatal re-opening. This effect of adventitious roots was not reproduced by foliar applications of benzyl adenine and gibberellic acid.

conclusionsStomata of flooded plants did not close in response to short-lived decreases in psi(L) or to increased C(i) resulting from impaired PSII photochemistry. Instead, stomatal closure depressed C(i) and this in turn largely explained subsequent changes in chlorophyll fluorescence parameters. Stomatal opening was promoted by the presence of well-aerated adventitious roots, implying that loss of function of root signalling contributes to closing of stomata during flooding. The possibility that this involves inhibition of cytokinin or gibberellin export was not well supported.

Indexed as

FloodsSignal TransductionAbscisic AcidCarbon DioxideChlorophyllCytokininsFluorescenceGibberellinsPhotosynthesisPhotosystem II Protein ComplexPlant LeavesPlant RootsPlant StomataPlant TranspirationSoilSolanum lycopersicumAbscisic AcidCarbon DioxideChlorophyllCytokininsgibberellic acidGibberellinsPhotosystem II Protein ComplexSoilWater

Identifiers

PMID19001430
PMCPMC2707317
OpenAlexW2144670322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.