ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2008
Maximising recruitment and retention of general practices in clinical trials: a case study.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- What works to recruit general practices to trials? A rapid review.HRB open research · 2023Pooled it
- Investigating a structured diagnostic approach for chronic breathlessness in primary care: a mixed-methods feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial.BMJ open respiratory research · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Recruiting general practitioners and patients with dementia into a cluster randomised controlled trial: strategies, barriers and facilitators.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Feasibility of a randomised trial of a continuing medical education program in shared decision-making on the use of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections in primary care: the DECISION+ pilot trial.Implementation science : IS · 2011Trial
- Offering antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia screening to pregnant women in primary care: a qualitative study of GPs' experiences.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010Trial
- Effectiveness of earlier antenatal screening for sickle cell disease and thalassaemia in primary care: cluster randomised trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2010Trial
- Towards socially inclusive research: an evaluation of telephone questionnaire administration in a multilingual population.BMC medical research methodology · 2008Trial
- Review of Manpower Management in Healthcare System: Strategies, Challenges, and Innovations.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Review
- Recruitment and retention of primary care practices in the Southeastern Collaboration to Improve Blood Pressure Control.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2023Article
- Implementing a community specialist team to support the delivery of integrated diabetes care: experiences in Ireland during the COVID-19 pandemic.HRB open research · 2023Article
- Reflections on recruiting healthcare professionals as research participants: Learning from the ONSPres Study.HRB open research · 2022Article
- Pilot and feasibility studies for pragmatic trials have unique considerations and areas of uncertainty.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2021Article
- Acceptability and feasibility of conducting a pilot trial in Irish primary care: lessons from the IDEAs study.HRB open research · 2021Article
- Exploring factors influencing recruitment results of nurses recruiting diabetes patients for a randomized controlled trial.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2020Article
- Article
- Strategies for recruiting a sample of adults with type 2 diabetes from primary care clinics in rural Appalachia: Incorporating cultural competence.International journal of nursing sciences · 2018Article
- Recruiting primary care practices for practice-based research: a case study of a group-randomized study (TRANSLATE CKD) recruitment process.Family practice · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is limited evidence regarding the factors that facilitate recruitment and retention of general practices in clinical trials. It is therefore pertinent to consider the factors that facilitate research in primary care.
aimTo formulate hypotheses about effective ways of recruiting and retaining practices to clinical trials, based on a case study. DESIGN OF STUDY: Case study of practice recruitment and retention to a trial of delivering antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia screening.
settingTwo UK primary care trusts with 123 practices, with a high incidence of sickle cell and thalassaemia, and high levels of social deprivation.
methodPractices were invited to take part in the trial using a research information sheet for practices. Invitations were sent to all practice managers, GPs, practice nurses, and nurse practitioners. Expenses of approximately pound 3000 per practice were available. Practices and the research team signed research activity agreements, detailing a payment schedule based on deliverables. Semi-structured interviews were completed with 20 GPs who participated in the trial. Outcome measures were the number of practices recruited to, and completing, the trial.
resultsFour practices did not agree to randomisation and were excluded. Of 119 eligible practices, 29 expressed an interest in participation. Two practices withdrew from the trial and 27 participated (two hosted pilot studies and 25 completed the trial), giving a retention rate of 93% (27/29). The 27 participating practices did not differ from non-participating practices in list size, number of GPs, social deprivation, or minority ethnic group composition of the practice population.
conclusionThree factors appeared important in recruiting practices: research topic, invitation method, and interest in research. Three factors appeared important in retaining practices: good communication, easy data-collection methods, and payment upon meeting pre-agreed targets. The effectiveness of these factors at facilitating recruitment and retention requires assessment in experimental studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.