ArticleArthritis research & therapy2008
Limited reliability of the indirect immunofluorescence technique for the detection of anti-Rib-P antibodies.
Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antinuclear antibody targets in autoimmune hepatitis and drug-induced liver injury: Diagnostic relevance of nucleosome antibodies.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Human VH4-34 antibodies derived from B1 cells are more frequently autoreactive than VH4-34 antibodies derived from memory cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Pregnancy-induced leukocytosis: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Disease criteria of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); the potential role of non-criteria autoantibodies.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2022Article
- Standardization and Quality Assessment Under the Perspective of Automated Computer-Assisted HEp-2 Immunofluorescence Assay Systems.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Antinuclear Antibody-Negative Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in an International Inception Cohort.Arthritis care & research · 2019Article
- Antinuclear antibody testing in a Turkish pediatrics clinic: is it always necessary?The Pan African medical journal · 2019Article
- Antinuclear antibodies detection: A comparative study between automated recognition and conventional visual interpretation.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2019Article
- How does autoimmune disease impact treatment and outcomes among patients with lung cancer? A national SEER-Medicare analysis.Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2018Article
- Emerging technologies in autoantibody testing for rheumatic diseases.Arthritis research & therapy · 2017Review
- Dramatic enhancement of the detection limits of bioassays via ultrafast deposition of polydopamine.Nature biomedical engineering · 2017Article
- Pregnancy complicated with agranulocytosis.Medicine · 2016Article
- Recognition of the dense fine speckled (DFS) pattern remains challenging: results from an international internet-based survey.Auto- immunity highlights · 2016Article
- Anti-ribosomal-P antibodies in lupus nephritis, neuropsychiatric lupus, lupus hepatitis, and Chagas' disease: promising yet limited in clinical utility.Rheumatology international · 2015Review
- Current concepts and future directions for the assessment of autoantibodies to cellular antigens referred to as anti-nuclear antibodies.Journal of immunology research · 2014Review
- Anti-ribosomal P protein IgG autoantibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: diagnostic performance and clinical profile.BMC medicine · 2013Article
- Clinical phenotypes of patients with anti-DFS70/LEDGF antibodies in a routine ANA referral cohort.Clinical & developmental immunology · 2013Article
- Toward a new autoantibody diagnostic orthodoxy: understanding the bad, good and indifferent.Auto- immunity highlights · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAutoantibodies to the ribosomal P proteins represent a highly specific marker for the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus, where they have been associated with certain clinical manifestations. Historically, autoantibodies against ribosomal P proteins have been detected by indirect immunofluorescence, immunodiffusion, immunoblot, and other immunoassays. More recently, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and line and addressable laser bead immunoassays have become more widely used. The primary goal of this study was to determine the sensitivity of indirect immunofluorescence using conventional HEp-2 substrates in the detection of sera with ribosomal P antibodies as detected by other immunoassays.
methodsAnti-ribosomal P-positive sera (n = 345) as detected by an addressable laser bead immunoassay were collected between 2003 and 2007 and analysed by indirect immunofluorescence. Furthermore, 51 anti-ribosomal P-positive samples from an unselected systemic lupus erythematosus cohort (n = 100) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) reference sera were tested for anti-ribosomal P reactivity.
resultsIn the cohort of 345 anti-ribosomal P-positive samples identified by addressable laser bead immunoassay, a low sensitivity (<30%) of indirect immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cell substrates was observed. Although the degree of sensitivity varied among different manufacturers, all immunofluorescence substrates exhibited limited sensitivity and false-negative results were not restricted to samples with low anti-ribosomal P titers. Even the anti-ribosomal P reactivity of CDC ANA reference serum number 12 was not clearly predictable by indirect immunofluorescence. Comparison of five different methods for the detection of anti-ribosomal P found moderate qualitative agreements.
conclusionsBased on our data, we conclude that indirect immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cells is not a reliable screening test for the prediction of ribosomal P antibodies. As this method is widely used as a first-line screening test for anti-nuclear and other autoantibodies, special considerations for the detection of ribosomal P antibodies are needed. As with many other autoantibodies, further effort is required for the standardisation of ribosomal P immunoassays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.