Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18999312›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2008

Comparison of ontology-based semantic-similarity measures.

Wei-Nchih Lee, Nigam Shah, Karanjot Sundlass, Mark Musen

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Neuro-ontology for the neurological examination.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020
    Article
  5. A new method for the automatic retrieval of medical cases based on the RadLex ontology.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Alignment and clustering of breast cancer patients by longitudinal treatment history.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2011
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Semantic Similarity and Relatedness between Clinical Terms: An Experimental Study.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2010
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wei-Nchih LeeCenter for Biomedical Informatics and Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Nigam Shah
Karanjot Sundlass
Mark Musen

Funding

STANFORD COMPOSITE(RMI)U54HG004028 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MUSEN, MARK A · 2005 to 2014
$36.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG004028NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG004028.PHS HHS 07033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Semantic-similarity measures quantify concept similarities in a given ontology. Potential applications for these measures include search, data mining, and knowledge discovery in database or decision-support systems that utilize ontologies. To date, there have not been comparisons of the different semantic-similarity approaches on a single ontology. Such a comparison can offer insight on the validity of different approaches. We compared 3 approaches to semantic similarity-metrics (which rely on expert opinion, ontologies only, and information content) with 4 metrics applied to SNOMED-CT. We found that there was poor agreement among those metrics based on information content with the ontology only metric. The metric based only on the ontology structure correlated most with expert opinion. Our results suggest that metrics based on the ontology only may be preferable to information-content-based metrics, and point to the need for more research on validating the different approaches.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceNatural Language ProcessingSemanticsSystematized Nomenclature of MedicineCaliforniaPattern Recognition, Automated

Identifiers

PMID18999312
PMCPMC2655943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.