Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18999127›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2008

Semantic processing to support clinical guideline development.

Marcelo Fiszman, Eduardo Ortiz, Bruce E Bray, Thomas C Rindflesch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A new iterative method to reduce workload in systematic review process.International journal of computational biology and drug design · 2013
    Article
  6. Text summarization as a decision support aid.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2012
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Adapting Semantic Natural Language Processing Technology to Address Information Overload in Influenza Epidemic Management.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology : JASIST · 2010
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marcelo FiszmanNational Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Eduardo Ortiz
Bruce E Bray
Thomas C Rindflesch

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines are one of the main resources for communicating evidence-based practice to health professionals. During guideline development, questions that express a knowledge gap are answered by finding relevant citations in MEDLINE and other biomedical databases. Determining citation relevance involves extensive manual review. We propose an automated method for finding relevant citations based on guideline question classification, semantic processing, and rules that match question classes with semantic predications. In this initial study, we focused on a pediatric cardiovascular risk factor guideline. The overall performance of the system was 40% recall, 88% precision (F0.5-score 0.71), and 98% specificity. We show that relevant and nonrelevant citations have clinically different semantic characteristics and suggest that this method has the potential to improve the efficiency of the literature review process in guideline development.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNatural Language ProcessingPractice Guidelines as TopicSemanticsVocabulary, ControlledInformation Storage and RetrievalPattern Recognition, AutomatedUnited States

Identifiers

PMID18999127
PMCPMC2656081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.