Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18999051›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2008

Optimizing A syndromic surveillance text classifier for influenza-like illness: Does document source matter?

Brett R South, Brett Ray South, Wendy W Chapman, Wendy Chapman, Sylvain Delisle, Shuying Shen, Ericka Kalp, Trish Perl, Matthew H Samore, Adi V Gundlapalli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Validating a strategy for psychosocial phenotyping using a large corpus of clinical text.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2013
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Brett R SouthVA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, USA.
Brett Ray South
Wendy W Chapman
Wendy Chapman
Sylvain Delisle
Shuying Shen
Ericka Kalp
Trish Perl
Matthew H Samore
Adi V Gundlapalli

Funding

NLP Foundational Studies & Ontologies for Syndromic Surveillance from ED ReportsR01LM009427 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CHAPMAN, WENDY W. · 2007 to 2009
$1.4M
NLM NIH HHS 1 R01LM009427-NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Syndromic surveillance systems that incorporate electronic free-text data have primarily focused on extracting concepts of interest from chief complaint text, emergency department visit notes, and nurse triage notes. Due to availability and access, there has been limited work in the area of surveilling the full text of all electronic note documents compared with more specific document sources. This study provides an evaluation of the performance of a text classifier for detection of influenza-like illness (ILI) by document sources that are commonly used for biosurveillance by comparing them to routine visit notes, and a full electronic note corpus approach. Evaluating the performance of an automated text classifier for syndromic surveillance by source document will inform decisions regarding electronic textual data sources for potential use by automated biosurveillance systems. Even when a full electronic medical record is available, commonly available surveillance source documents provide acceptable statistical performance for automated ILI surveillance.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceDocumentationHumansInfluenza, HumanInformation Storage and RetrievalMedical History TakingMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedPattern Recognition, AutomatedPopulation SurveillanceReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySyndromeUnited StatesVocabulary, Controlled

Identifiers

PMID18999051
PMCPMC2655960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.