ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2008
SNOMED CT coding variation and grouping for "other findings" in a longitudinal study on urea cycle disorders.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00237315 (Longitudinal Study of Urea Cycle Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Longitudinal Study of Urea Cycle Disorders
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Knowledge Levels Required for SNOMED CT Coding of Diagnosis and Operation Names in Clinical Records.Healthcare informatics research · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Semantic interoperability requires consistent use of controlled terminologies. However, non-terminology experts (although perhaps experts in a particular domain) are prone to produce variant coding. We examine this problem by investigating SNOMED CT coding variation for other findings reported on case report forms from a clinical research study on urea cycle disorders. The natural language findings from the forms were normalized, and the associated SNOMED CT concept descriptions were compared. The subset of normalized strings associated with two different concept descriptions were further compared to determine the relationship among the associated SNOMED CT concepts. We found 45% of the concept description pairs were associated with two hierarchically related concepts or with the same concept, while 55% were associated with two unrelated concepts. Clearer guidelines for use of SNOMED CT in particular contexts, or structured data entry tools tailored to the needs of non-expert coders, are needed to better manage coding variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18998949PMC2656069What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.