Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18998182›Full record

ReviewCognitive processing2009

Plant neurobiology: from sensory biology, via plant communication, to social plant behavior.

Frantisek Baluska, Stefano Mancuso

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cognitive processing, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The botanical multiverse of Peter Barlow.Communicative & integrative biology · 2019
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Senomic view of the cell: SenomeCommunicative & integrative biology · 2018
    Review
  12. How do Plants Keep their Functional Integrity?Plant signaling & behavior · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Plant intelligence and attention.Plant signaling & behavior · 2013
    Article
  17. Root apex transition zone as oscillatory zone.Frontiers in plant science · 2013
    Article
  18. The plant as a biomechatronic system.Plant signaling & behavior · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Frantisek BaluskaIZMB, University of Bonn, Kirschallee 1, 53115, Bonn, Germany. baluska@uni-bonn.de
Stefano Mancuso

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In plants, numerous parameters of both biotic and abiotic environments are continuously monitored. Specialized cells are evolutionary-optimized for effective translation of sensory input into developmental and motoric output. Importantly, diverse physical forces, influences, and insults induce immediate electric responses in plants. Recent advances in plant cell biology, molecular biology, and sensory ecology will be discussed in the framework of recently initiated new discipline of plant sciences, namely plant neurobiology.

Indexed as

NeurobiologyPlantsAction PotentialsSensationSignal Transduction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.